Future contactless payment options for transport for London : demand, cost, equity, and fair policy implications

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2007.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dorfman, Matthew James
Other Authors: George Kocur and Nigel H.M. Wilson.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40380
_version_ 1826199271409451008
author Dorfman, Matthew James
author2 George Kocur and Nigel H.M. Wilson.
author_facet George Kocur and Nigel H.M. Wilson.
Dorfman, Matthew James
author_sort Dorfman, Matthew James
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2007.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:17:07Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/40380
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:17:07Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/403802022-01-31T19:42:35Z Future contactless payment options for transport for London : demand, cost, equity, and fair policy implications Dorfman, Matthew James George Kocur and Nigel H.M. Wilson. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division Technology and Policy Program Technology and Policy Program. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (p. 117-120). This thesis assesses fare payment technologies for Transport for London in 2015. Based on a survey of technical literature, feasible payments technologies in 2015 include current smartcard technology, contactless bankcards and near-field communication (NFC) mobile phones. Five fare payment options based on these three technologies are proposed. Options 1-3 use contactless bankcards and NFC phones as the fare medium. Option 1 requires tap-in only and uses flat fares; it is a standard retail transaction. Option 2 is like Option 1 but adds a rebate program to approximate the effects of passes and transfer discounts. Option 3 requires users to tap-in and tap-out, and supports traditional transit fares. Option 4 continues the current use of a proprietary smartcard to implement traditional transit fare structures. Option 5 uses a vehicle-based smartcard reader that does not require barriers or fareboxes; it supports traditional transit fare structures and path- and service-based pricing. The five options are evaluated on four dimensions: cost, demand, equity, and fare policy. Options 1-3 have significantly lower costs due to the use of commercial payment media. Option 4's costs are similar to current costs. (cont.) Option 5 is significantly more expensive and offers few benefits for London. To analyze demand, an incremental logit demand model was created. It shows that under conservative assumptions about passenger behavior, option 1 generates a moderate loss in revenue and ridership, while under more generous assumptions, a moderate gain occurs. Options 2 through 5 result in small changes in ridership or revenue. All five options maintain or potentially improve passenger equity, especially if passes requiring up-front payment are de-emphasized, allowing lower income travelers to obtain the best fares. Options 2 and 3 offer the greatest opportunity for customer service improvement and cost savings. Option 1 has a higher demand risk and decreased fare policy flexibility. Option 4 has limited potential for cost saving or revenue increase, and Option 5 is prohibitively expensive. Peak pricing is also investigated, and is shown to offer some benefits in creating available capacity. by Matthew Dorfman. S.M. 2008-02-27T22:17:31Z 2008-02-27T22:17:31Z 2007 2007 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40380 191100632 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 120 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Technology and Policy Program.
Dorfman, Matthew James
Future contactless payment options for transport for London : demand, cost, equity, and fair policy implications
title Future contactless payment options for transport for London : demand, cost, equity, and fair policy implications
title_full Future contactless payment options for transport for London : demand, cost, equity, and fair policy implications
title_fullStr Future contactless payment options for transport for London : demand, cost, equity, and fair policy implications
title_full_unstemmed Future contactless payment options for transport for London : demand, cost, equity, and fair policy implications
title_short Future contactless payment options for transport for London : demand, cost, equity, and fair policy implications
title_sort future contactless payment options for transport for london demand cost equity and fair policy implications
topic Technology and Policy Program.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40380
work_keys_str_mv AT dorfmanmatthewjames futurecontactlesspaymentoptionsfortransportforlondondemandcostequityandfairpolicyimplications