Transcendence, Facticity, and Modes of Non-Being

A.I. Laboratory working papers are produced for internal circulation, and may contain information that is, for example, to preliminary, too detailed, or too silly for formal publication. This paper handsomely satisfies all three criteria. While it is destined to become a landmark in its genre, reade...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donald, B. Randall, Canny, J. Francis
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory 2008
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41492
_version_ 1826189080147263488
author Donald, B. Randall
Canny, J. Francis
author_facet Donald, B. Randall
Canny, J. Francis
author_sort Donald, B. Randall
collection MIT
description A.I. Laboratory working papers are produced for internal circulation, and may contain information that is, for example, to preliminary, too detailed, or too silly for formal publication. This paper handsomely satisfies all three criteria. While it is destined to become a landmark in its genre, readers are cautioned against making reference to this paper in the literature, as the authors would like to rejoin society with a clean slate. This paper could not have been produced without the assistance of many brilliant but unstable individuals who could not be reached for comment, and whose names have been suppressed pending determination of competence.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:09:32Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/41492
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:09:32Z
publishDate 2008
publisher MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/414922019-04-09T16:59:19Z Transcendence, Facticity, and Modes of Non-Being Donald, B. Randall Canny, J. Francis A.I. Laboratory working papers are produced for internal circulation, and may contain information that is, for example, to preliminary, too detailed, or too silly for formal publication. This paper handsomely satisfies all three criteria. While it is destined to become a landmark in its genre, readers are cautioned against making reference to this paper in the literature, as the authors would like to rejoin society with a clean slate. This paper could not have been produced without the assistance of many brilliant but unstable individuals who could not be reached for comment, and whose names have been suppressed pending determination of competence. Research in artificial intelligence has yet to satisfactorily address the primordial fissure between human consciousness and the material order. How is this split reconciled in terms of human reality? By what duality is Bad Faith possible? We show that the answer is quite subtle, and of particular relevance to certain classical A.I. problems in introspection and intensional belief structure. A principled approach to bad faith and the consciousness of the other is suggested. We present ideas for an implementation in the domain of chemical engineering. MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory 2008-04-28T14:55:11Z 2008-04-28T14:55:11Z 1986-03 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41492 en_US MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Working Papers, WP-282 Working Paper, No. 282 application/pdf MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
spellingShingle Donald, B. Randall
Canny, J. Francis
Transcendence, Facticity, and Modes of Non-Being
title Transcendence, Facticity, and Modes of Non-Being
title_full Transcendence, Facticity, and Modes of Non-Being
title_fullStr Transcendence, Facticity, and Modes of Non-Being
title_full_unstemmed Transcendence, Facticity, and Modes of Non-Being
title_short Transcendence, Facticity, and Modes of Non-Being
title_sort transcendence facticity and modes of non being
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41492
work_keys_str_mv AT donaldbrandall transcendencefacticityandmodesofnonbeing
AT cannyjfrancis transcendencefacticityandmodesofnonbeing