Building, block, street : residential block design

Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1996.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kamell, Elizabeth N. (Elizabeth Natanya)
Other Authors: Michael Dennis.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/43285
_version_ 1826188402413797376
author Kamell, Elizabeth N. (Elizabeth Natanya)
author2 Michael Dennis.
author_facet Michael Dennis.
Kamell, Elizabeth N. (Elizabeth Natanya)
author_sort Kamell, Elizabeth N. (Elizabeth Natanya)
collection MIT
description Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1996.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T07:59:05Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/43285
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T07:59:05Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/432852019-04-09T15:57:23Z Building, block, street : residential block design Kamell, Elizabeth N. (Elizabeth Natanya) Michael Dennis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture Architecture Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1996. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 75-76). Late twentieth-century housing, formed by economic and internally generated functional problems rather than by limitations imposed by traditional street pattern and block size, is fundamentally anti-urban. Modern American housing of the post-World War II era, like any complex social phenomenon, was influenced by multiple forces. Among the most salient are single proprietary control of large parcels of urban land and pre-World War II stylistic trends / social ideals, both of which were reinforced by revisions to zoning regulations. The traditional relationship of the individual dwelling to the block and the street (as well as the individual to the community, as represented by a parallel, formal urban organization) is altered as a result of a changed urban housing configuration. Although the urban characteristics of traditional eighteenth- and nineteenth-century housing blocks remain viable, the dwellings of which they were composed were products of an economic and social structure whose housing requirements are no longer appropriate in contemporary culture. Modem housing, not limited by normative street and block configuration fulfills some of the economic and programmatic requirements of contemporary society, but because it is inherently anti-urban its presence is ultimately destructive of civic life. Analysis of traditional residential urban blocks in terms of quantifiable urban characteristics provides a tool with which to measure and generate programatically modern housing determined by traditional urban constraints. by Elizabeth N. Kamell. M.S. 2008-11-07T19:24:28Z 2008-11-07T19:24:28Z 1996 1996 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/43285 36055844 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 77 leaves application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Architecture
Kamell, Elizabeth N. (Elizabeth Natanya)
Building, block, street : residential block design
title Building, block, street : residential block design
title_full Building, block, street : residential block design
title_fullStr Building, block, street : residential block design
title_full_unstemmed Building, block, street : residential block design
title_short Building, block, street : residential block design
title_sort building block street residential block design
topic Architecture
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/43285
work_keys_str_mv AT kamellelizabethnelizabethnatanya buildingblockstreetresidentialblockdesign