Running in place : renewal portfolio standards and climate change

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2008.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hogan, Michael T. (Michael Thomas)
Other Authors: Lawrence E. Susskind.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45379
_version_ 1826195372863651840
author Hogan, Michael T. (Michael Thomas)
author2 Lawrence E. Susskind.
author_facet Lawrence E. Susskind.
Hogan, Michael T. (Michael Thomas)
author_sort Hogan, Michael T. (Michael Thomas)
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2008.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:11:38Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/45379
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:11:38Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/453792019-04-12T09:57:29Z Running in place : renewal portfolio standards and climate change RPS and climate change Hogan, Michael T. (Michael Thomas) Lawrence E. Susskind. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Urban Studies and Planning. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2008. Includes bibliographical references (p. 193-213). Renewable portfolio standards ("RPS") have spread widely as states have made an effort to promote electricity production from renewable energy sources, granting privileged market access to eligible technologies and resources. One prominent public policy objective driving their rapid adoption and expansion in recent years has been the desire to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from the power sector. Eighty percent of power sector CO2, and thus one third of all U.S. CO2, comes from 620 conventional coal-fired power plants. Any one of the range of recent proposals to mitigate U.S. GHG emissions will require dramatic reductions in the CO2 emissions from these plants. This constitutes the essential challenge of power sector GHG policy - in a very real sense, nothing else matters. With this in mind, I have reviewed four state RPS programs - Connecticut, Minnesota, Colorado and California. I offer a thorough analysis of the available data regarding the experience to date in each of these states as well as indications of future compliance activity. My key finding is that the dominant policy approach imposes three key constraints on the RPS market space - targets expressed only in units of bulk energy, aggressive quantities and timelines, and restrictive program cost limits - resulting in the over-stimulation of terrestrial wind at the expense of other renewable technologies often far better suited to displacing coal and far more likely to experience dramatic improvements in cost and performance. In order to enhance the efficacy of these programs as climate policies, the following reforms are recommended: (1) create bands based on technological maturity and strongly favor promising early-stage technologies; (2) express targets in metrics more appropriate to replacing the grid's reliance on coal-fired plants; (cont.) (3); establish compliance guidelines allowing market participants to select higher-cost, early-stage technologies that promise a wider range of services befitting their system requirements; (4) express cost constraints in terms of overall program cost rather than per-unit price caps; (5) skew compliance schedules to smaller quantities from targeted early-stage technologies at the front end, ramping up more rapidly at the back end; and (6) optimize program costs and benefits by allowing some portion of compliance through geographically unrestricted purchase of renewable energy credits, with the balance mandated through purchases from strategic local resources. by Michael T. Hogan. S.M. 2009-04-29T17:33:15Z 2009-04-29T17:33:15Z 2008 2008 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45379 317296625 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 213 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Urban Studies and Planning.
Hogan, Michael T. (Michael Thomas)
Running in place : renewal portfolio standards and climate change
title Running in place : renewal portfolio standards and climate change
title_full Running in place : renewal portfolio standards and climate change
title_fullStr Running in place : renewal portfolio standards and climate change
title_full_unstemmed Running in place : renewal portfolio standards and climate change
title_short Running in place : renewal portfolio standards and climate change
title_sort running in place renewal portfolio standards and climate change
topic Urban Studies and Planning.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45379
work_keys_str_mv AT hoganmichaeltmichaelthomas runninginplacerenewalportfoliostandardsandclimatechange
AT hoganmichaeltmichaelthomas rpsandclimatechange