The effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies

In the absence of a federal policy to cap carbon emissions many states are moving forward with their own initiatives, which currently range from announcements of commitments to reduce greenhouse gases to a regional multi-state cap-and-trade program slated to begin in 2009. While federal legislation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McGuinness, Meghan, Ellerman, A. Denny
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
Format: Working Paper
Published: MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45518
_version_ 1811090011120992256
author McGuinness, Meghan
Ellerman, A. Denny
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
McGuinness, Meghan
Ellerman, A. Denny
author_sort McGuinness, Meghan
collection MIT
description In the absence of a federal policy to cap carbon emissions many states are moving forward with their own initiatives, which currently range from announcements of commitments to reduce greenhouse gases to a regional multi-state cap-and-trade program slated to begin in 2009. While federal legislation is expected in the next few years, it is unclear how such legislation will define the relationship between a federal cap and trade program and other state regulations. Assuming the introduction of a cap-and-trade program at the federal level, this paper analyzes the economic and environmental impacts of the range of possible interactions between the federal program and state programs. We find that the impacts of interaction depend on relative stringency of the federal and state program and overlap in source coverage. Where state programs are both duplicative of and more demanding than the federal cap, the effect is entirely redistributive of costs and emissions, with in-state sources facing higher marginal abatement costs. Also, differing marginal abatement costs among states create economic inefficiencies that make achievement of the climate goal more costly than it need be. These redistributive effects and the associated economic inefficiency are avoided under either federal preemption of duplicative state programs or a 'carve out' of state programs from the federal cap with linkage to the federal allowance market.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:29:08Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/45518
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:29:08Z
publishDate 2009
publisher MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/455182019-04-12T09:57:40Z The effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies McGuinness, Meghan Ellerman, A. Denny Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. In the absence of a federal policy to cap carbon emissions many states are moving forward with their own initiatives, which currently range from announcements of commitments to reduce greenhouse gases to a regional multi-state cap-and-trade program slated to begin in 2009. While federal legislation is expected in the next few years, it is unclear how such legislation will define the relationship between a federal cap and trade program and other state regulations. Assuming the introduction of a cap-and-trade program at the federal level, this paper analyzes the economic and environmental impacts of the range of possible interactions between the federal program and state programs. We find that the impacts of interaction depend on relative stringency of the federal and state program and overlap in source coverage. Where state programs are both duplicative of and more demanding than the federal cap, the effect is entirely redistributive of costs and emissions, with in-state sources facing higher marginal abatement costs. Also, differing marginal abatement costs among states create economic inefficiencies that make achievement of the climate goal more costly than it need be. These redistributive effects and the associated economic inefficiency are avoided under either federal preemption of duplicative state programs or a 'carve out' of state programs from the federal cap with linkage to the federal allowance market. 2009-05-13T20:35:19Z 2009-05-13T20:35:19Z 2008 Working Paper 2008-004 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45518 244443804 MIT-CEEPR (Series) ; 08-004WP. 43 p application/pdf MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
spellingShingle McGuinness, Meghan
Ellerman, A. Denny
The effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies
title The effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies
title_full The effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies
title_fullStr The effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies
title_full_unstemmed The effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies
title_short The effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies
title_sort effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45518
work_keys_str_mv AT mcguinnessmeghan theeffectsofinteractionsbetweenfederalandstateclimatepolicies
AT ellermanadenny theeffectsofinteractionsbetweenfederalandstateclimatepolicies
AT mcguinnessmeghan effectsofinteractionsbetweenfederalandstateclimatepolicies
AT ellermanadenny effectsofinteractionsbetweenfederalandstateclimatepolicies