Good intensions : paving two roads to a theory of the de re / de dicto distinction

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2008.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Keshet, Ezra Russell
Other Authors: Irene Heim.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45622
_version_ 1826207995162263552
author Keshet, Ezra Russell
author2 Irene Heim.
author_facet Irene Heim.
Keshet, Ezra Russell
author_sort Keshet, Ezra Russell
collection MIT
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2008.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:58:39Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/45622
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:58:39Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/456222019-04-12T09:58:56Z Good intensions : paving two roads to a theory of the de re / de dicto distinction Paving two roads to a theory of the de re / de dicto distinction Keshet, Ezra Russell Irene Heim. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Linguistics and Philosophy. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2008. This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections. Includes bibliographical references (p. 161-165). The main goal of this dissertation is to determine the best theory of de re/de dicto intensionality. Recently, it has become apparent that the traditional scope theory of this phenomenon is inadequate, the most marked evidence for this being the scope paradoxes discussed in Fodor (1970), BaƯuerle (1983), and Percus (2000). This work therefore discusses two theories designed to replace the traditional theory. The first such replacement is the situation pronoun theory, which posits covert pronouns in the syntax of natural language representing pairs of worlds and times.This theory overgenerates, though, in several areas where the scope theory does not.These are discussed in terms of several generalizations captured by the latter but not the former. First, extending work by Musan (1997), the Intersective Predicate Generalization (IPG) states that two nodes combined via Predicate Modification must be evaluated at the same world and time. To capture this generalization in the situation pronoun theory, a rule of Situation Economy is proposed, which favors natural language structures having fewer situation pronouns. However, three more generalizations are next discussed, based on and extending work by Percus (2000): Generalizations X, Y, and Z rule out de re readings for VPs, adverbs, and the head nouns of weak NPs, respectively. Proposals to capture these generalizations by Shimada (2007) and Schueler (2007) are discussed. The last chapter of the dissertation raises several new ways in which the situation pronoun theory predicts unattested readings of intensional sentences. (cont.) These cases,involving island constraints, polarity items, and subconstituents of DPs, are all captured under the scope theory. Therefore, a second replacement for the scope theory is proposed, which represents a more modest departure. The split intensionality system separates each intensional operator's quantificational force from its intensional force, by use of a new operator, ? after Montague (1970). Although further work is required, this new system preliminarily seems able to solve the problems with the traditional theory without overgenerating as the situation pronoun theory does. by Ezra Keshet. Ph.D. 2009-06-25T20:35:21Z 2009-06-25T20:35:21Z 2008 2008 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45622 320472279 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 165 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Linguistics and Philosophy.
Keshet, Ezra Russell
Good intensions : paving two roads to a theory of the de re / de dicto distinction
title Good intensions : paving two roads to a theory of the de re / de dicto distinction
title_full Good intensions : paving two roads to a theory of the de re / de dicto distinction
title_fullStr Good intensions : paving two roads to a theory of the de re / de dicto distinction
title_full_unstemmed Good intensions : paving two roads to a theory of the de re / de dicto distinction
title_short Good intensions : paving two roads to a theory of the de re / de dicto distinction
title_sort good intensions paving two roads to a theory of the de re de dicto distinction
topic Linguistics and Philosophy.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45622
work_keys_str_mv AT keshetezrarussell goodintensionspavingtworoadstoatheoryofthederededictodistinction
AT keshetezrarussell pavingtworoadstoatheoryofthederededictodistinction