A note on the interpretation of factor analysis, or; Factor analysis: what good is it?

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armstrong, Jon Scott, Soelberg, Peer
Format: Working Paper
Published: [Cambridge, M.I.T 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/48601
_version_ 1811094106491846656
author Armstrong, Jon Scott
Soelberg, Peer
author_facet Armstrong, Jon Scott
Soelberg, Peer
author_sort Armstrong, Jon Scott
collection MIT
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:55:11Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/48601
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:55:11Z
publishDate 2009
publisher [Cambridge, M.I.T
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/486012019-04-10T23:38:10Z A note on the interpretation of factor analysis, or; Factor analysis: what good is it? Armstrong, Jon Scott Soelberg, Peer Factor analysis. 2009-10-03T06:37:06Z 2009-10-03T06:37:06Z 1967 Working Paper noteoninterpreta00arms http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/48601 14368443 000258402 Working paper (Sloan School of Management) ; 254-67. application/pdf [Cambridge, M.I.T
spellingShingle Factor analysis.
Armstrong, Jon Scott
Soelberg, Peer
A note on the interpretation of factor analysis, or; Factor analysis: what good is it?
title A note on the interpretation of factor analysis, or; Factor analysis: what good is it?
title_full A note on the interpretation of factor analysis, or; Factor analysis: what good is it?
title_fullStr A note on the interpretation of factor analysis, or; Factor analysis: what good is it?
title_full_unstemmed A note on the interpretation of factor analysis, or; Factor analysis: what good is it?
title_short A note on the interpretation of factor analysis, or; Factor analysis: what good is it?
title_sort note on the interpretation of factor analysis or factor analysis what good is it
topic Factor analysis.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/48601
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongjonscott anoteontheinterpretationoffactoranalysisorfactoranalysiswhatgoodisit
AT soelbergpeer anoteontheinterpretationoffactoranalysisorfactoranalysiswhatgoodisit
AT armstrongjonscott noteontheinterpretationoffactoranalysisorfactoranalysiswhatgoodisit
AT soelbergpeer noteontheinterpretationoffactoranalysisorfactoranalysiswhatgoodisit