Experience and Content

The 'content view', in slogan form, is 'Perceptual experiences have representational content'. I explain why the content view should be reformulated to remove any reference to 'experiences'. I then argue, against Bill Brewer, Charles Travis and others, that the content...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Byrne, Alex
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Blackwell Publishing 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50132
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3652-1492
_version_ 1826190805104066560
author Byrne, Alex
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Byrne, Alex
author_sort Byrne, Alex
collection MIT
description The 'content view', in slogan form, is 'Perceptual experiences have representational content'. I explain why the content view should be reformulated to remove any reference to 'experiences'. I then argue, against Bill Brewer, Charles Travis and others, that the content view is true. One corollary of the discussion is that the content of perception is relatively thin (confined, in the visual case, to roughly the output of 'mid-level' vision). Finally, I argue (briefly) that the opponents of the content view are partially vindicated, because perceptual error is due to false belief.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:45:57Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/50132
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:45:57Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Blackwell Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/501322022-09-23T14:23:06Z Experience and Content Byrne, Alex Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Byrne, Alex Byrne, Alex The 'content view', in slogan form, is 'Perceptual experiences have representational content'. I explain why the content view should be reformulated to remove any reference to 'experiences'. I then argue, against Bill Brewer, Charles Travis and others, that the content view is true. One corollary of the discussion is that the content of perception is relatively thin (confined, in the visual case, to roughly the output of 'mid-level' vision). Finally, I argue (briefly) that the opponents of the content view are partially vindicated, because perceptual error is due to false belief. 2009-12-11T20:13:54Z 2009-12-11T20:13:54Z 2009-04 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/SubmittedJournalArticle 0031-8094 1467-9213 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50132 Byrne, Alex. “Experience and Content.” The Philosophical Quarterly 59.236 (2009): 429-451. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3652-1492 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.614.x Philosophical Quarterly Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ application/pdf Blackwell Publishing Alex Byrne
spellingShingle Byrne, Alex
Experience and Content
title Experience and Content
title_full Experience and Content
title_fullStr Experience and Content
title_full_unstemmed Experience and Content
title_short Experience and Content
title_sort experience and content
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50132
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3652-1492
work_keys_str_mv AT byrnealex experienceandcontent