Bringing it all to the table : examining variance in strategic approaches within the six-party talk

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2009.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zahorchak, Jason M
Other Authors: Richard J. Samuels.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53241
_version_ 1826193867608686592
author Zahorchak, Jason M
author2 Richard J. Samuels.
author_facet Richard J. Samuels.
Zahorchak, Jason M
author_sort Zahorchak, Jason M
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2009.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:46:34Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/53241
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:46:34Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/532412019-04-10T21:32:05Z Bringing it all to the table : examining variance in strategic approaches within the six-party talk Examining variance in strategic approaches within the six-party talk Zahorchak, Jason M Richard J. Samuels. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. Political Science. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2009. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references. In the approaches seen at the six-party talks on North Korea's nuclear program, why did states faced with the same security problem adopt different strategies? Answering this question will bring understanding to why the process has proceeded in fits and starts, as the countries negotiating with Pyongyang - China, Japan, Russia, South Korea, and the United States - often struggle to coordinate strategy in their quest to resolve a grave issue of international security. This paper approaches the question by taking up three possible drivers behind strategy among the five negotiating countries - realist calculations, domestic political institutions, and national identity - and, tracing each country's strategy within the talks, identifies the most likely of these drivers for each state. This study finds that while the United States, China, and Russia bring primarily realist concerns to the table, they employ separate strategies toward the North Korean nuclear issue, reflecting differing drivers and goals. In addition, South Korea and Japan see their strategies driven by issues related to national identity and domestic politics. In looking at the origins of these drivers, this study finds that China's realist drive stems largely from its particular vision of economic and geopolitical growth; Japan's push for a resolution to the kidnapping issue stems from politicians' aim for domestic political popularity made easier through Japan's lack of a history of relations with North Korea; Russia's realist drive derives from the Putin-led push to regain a semblance of its historical sphere of influence; (cont.) South Korea's focus on peninsular engagement comes from a renewed nationalism, its legacy as a "divided nation," and a reimagining of the North Korea threat; and the United States' concentration on realist factors is derived from unique aspects of the post-September 11, 2001 security environment as well as a reassertion of regional goals that underscores U.S.-China competition. by Jason M. Zahorchak. S.M. 2010-03-25T15:19:38Z 2010-03-25T15:19:38Z 2009 2009 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53241 535840015 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 96 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Political Science.
Zahorchak, Jason M
Bringing it all to the table : examining variance in strategic approaches within the six-party talk
title Bringing it all to the table : examining variance in strategic approaches within the six-party talk
title_full Bringing it all to the table : examining variance in strategic approaches within the six-party talk
title_fullStr Bringing it all to the table : examining variance in strategic approaches within the six-party talk
title_full_unstemmed Bringing it all to the table : examining variance in strategic approaches within the six-party talk
title_short Bringing it all to the table : examining variance in strategic approaches within the six-party talk
title_sort bringing it all to the table examining variance in strategic approaches within the six party talk
topic Political Science.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53241
work_keys_str_mv AT zahorchakjasonm bringingitalltothetableexaminingvarianceinstrategicapproacheswithinthesixpartytalk
AT zahorchakjasonm examiningvarianceinstrategicapproacheswithinthesixpartytalk