Field's Logic of Truth

Saving Truth from Paradox is a re-exciting development. The 70s and 80s were a time of excitement among people working on the semantic paradoxes. There were continual formal developments, with the constant hope that these results would yield deep insights. The enthusiasm wore off, however, as people...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McGee, Vann
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Springer Netherlands 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53713
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-5051
_version_ 1826210524094791680
author McGee, Vann
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
McGee, Vann
author_sort McGee, Vann
collection MIT
description Saving Truth from Paradox is a re-exciting development. The 70s and 80s were a time of excitement among people working on the semantic paradoxes. There were continual formal developments, with the constant hope that these results would yield deep insights. The enthusiasm wore off, however, as people became more cognizant of the disparity between what they had accomplished, impressive as it was, and what they had hoped to accomplish. They moved onto other problems that they hoped would prove more yielding. That, at least, was how it seemed to me, so I was delighted to see a dramatically new formal development that is likely to rekindle our enthusiasm.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:51:02Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/53713
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:51:02Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/537132022-09-29T10:58:38Z Field's Logic of Truth McGee, Vann Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy McGee, Vann McGee, Vann Saving Truth from Paradox is a re-exciting development. The 70s and 80s were a time of excitement among people working on the semantic paradoxes. There were continual formal developments, with the constant hope that these results would yield deep insights. The enthusiasm wore off, however, as people became more cognizant of the disparity between what they had accomplished, impressive as it was, and what they had hoped to accomplish. They moved onto other problems that they hoped would prove more yielding. That, at least, was how it seemed to me, so I was delighted to see a dramatically new formal development that is likely to rekindle our enthusiasm. 2010-04-15T14:12:49Z 2010-04-15T14:12:49Z 2010-02 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/SubmittedJournalArticle 1573-0883 0031-8116 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53713 McGee, Vann. “Field’s logic of truth.” Philosophical Studies 147.3 (2010): 421-432. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-5051 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9467-6 Philosophical Studies Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ application/pdf Springer Netherlands Vann McGee
spellingShingle McGee, Vann
Field's Logic of Truth
title Field's Logic of Truth
title_full Field's Logic of Truth
title_fullStr Field's Logic of Truth
title_full_unstemmed Field's Logic of Truth
title_short Field's Logic of Truth
title_sort field s logic of truth
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53713
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-5051
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgeevann fieldslogicoftruth