Computational experience and the explanatory value of condition numbers for linear optimization

Abstract in HTML and working paper for download in PDF available via World Wide Web at the Social Science Research Network.

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Ordóñez, Fernando, 1970-
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Center 2004
Online Access:http://papers2.ssrn.com/paper.taf?ABSTRACT%5FID=299326
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5408
_version_ 1826198409575399424
author2 Ordóñez, Fernando, 1970-
author_facet Ordóñez, Fernando, 1970-
collection MIT
description Abstract in HTML and working paper for download in PDF available via World Wide Web at the Social Science Research Network.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:04:26Z
id mit-1721.1/5408
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:04:26Z
publishDate 2004
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Center
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/54082019-04-10T10:36:21Z Computational experience and the explanatory value of condition numbers for linear optimization Ordóñez, Fernando, 1970- Freund, Robert M. Abstract in HTML and working paper for download in PDF available via World Wide Web at the Social Science Research Network. Title from cover. "January 2002." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 32-34). The goal of this paper is to develop some computational experience and test the practical relevance of the theory of condition numbers C(d) for linear optimization, as applied to problem instances that one might encounter in practice. We used the NETLIB suite of linear optimization problems as a test bed for condition number computation and analysis. Our computational results indicate that 72% of the NETLIB suite problem instances are ill-conditioned. However, after pre-processing heuristics are applied, only 19% of the post-processed problem instances are ill-conditioned, and log C(d) of the finitely-conditioned post-processed problems is fairly nicely distributed. We also show that the number of IPM iterations needed to solve the problems in the NETLIB suite varies roughly linearly (and monotonically) with log C(d) of the post-processed problem instances. Empirical evidence yields a positive linear relationship between IPM iterations and log C(d) for the post-processed problem instances, significant at the 95% confidence level. Furthermore, 42% of the variation in IPM iterations among the NETLIB suite problem instances is accounted for by log C(d) of the problem instances after pre-processing. Keywords: Convex Optimization, Complexity, Interior-Point Method, Barrier Method. Fernando Ordonez [and] Robert M. Freund. 2004-06-01T16:43:10Z 2004-06-01T16:43:10Z 2002 2002 4337-02 http://papers2.ssrn.com/paper.taf?ABSTRACT%5FID=299326 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5408 eng Operations Research Center Working Paper;OR 361-02 http://papers2.ssrn.com/paper.taf?ABSTRACT%5FID=299326 34 leaves 2013959 bytes application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Center
spellingShingle Computational experience and the explanatory value of condition numbers for linear optimization
title Computational experience and the explanatory value of condition numbers for linear optimization
title_full Computational experience and the explanatory value of condition numbers for linear optimization
title_fullStr Computational experience and the explanatory value of condition numbers for linear optimization
title_full_unstemmed Computational experience and the explanatory value of condition numbers for linear optimization
title_short Computational experience and the explanatory value of condition numbers for linear optimization
title_sort computational experience and the explanatory value of condition numbers for linear optimization
url http://papers2.ssrn.com/paper.taf?ABSTRACT%5FID=299326
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5408