Practical knowledge and abilities

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2009.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Glick, Ephraim N
Other Authors: Robert Stalnaker.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/55177
_version_ 1826213812612628480
author Glick, Ephraim N
author2 Robert Stalnaker.
author_facet Robert Stalnaker.
Glick, Ephraim N
author_sort Glick, Ephraim N
collection MIT
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2009.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:55:13Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/55177
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:55:13Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/551772019-04-10T08:41:48Z Practical knowledge and abilities Glick, Ephraim N Robert Stalnaker. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Linguistics and Philosophy. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2009. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 115-118). The thesis is an exploration of the relations between know-how, abilities, and ordinary knowledge of facts. It is shown that there is a distinctively practical sort of know-how and a corresponding interpretation of 'S knows how to [phi]', and that this special sort of know-how, while possessing representational content, is not simply ordinary knowledge-that. The view rests on a novel distinction between two interpretations of the Intellectualist slogan, familiar from the work of Gilbert Ryle, that know-how is a kind of knowledge-that. The distinction allows us to clarify the issues that are at stake in the debate and see the possibility of a position that combines aspects of both Intellectualism and anti-Intellectualism. An entailment from knowhow to a certain sort of ability is defended, and it is shown that the present view preserves the possibility of appealing to know-how to block Frank Jackson's "knowledge argument" against physicalism. by Ephraim N. Glick. Ph.D. 2010-05-25T20:58:11Z 2010-05-25T20:58:11Z 2009 2009 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/55177 608215768 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 118 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Linguistics and Philosophy.
Glick, Ephraim N
Practical knowledge and abilities
title Practical knowledge and abilities
title_full Practical knowledge and abilities
title_fullStr Practical knowledge and abilities
title_full_unstemmed Practical knowledge and abilities
title_short Practical knowledge and abilities
title_sort practical knowledge and abilities
topic Linguistics and Philosophy.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/55177
work_keys_str_mv AT glickephraimn practicalknowledgeandabilities