Towards a Better Definition of Transactions

This paper builds on a technical report written by Carl Hewitt and Henry Baker called "Actors and Continuous Functionals". What is called a "goal-oriented activity" in that paper will be referred to in this paper as a "transaction". The word "transaction"...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kerns, Barbara S.
Language:en_US
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5695
_version_ 1811068544250544128
author Kerns, Barbara S.
author_facet Kerns, Barbara S.
author_sort Kerns, Barbara S.
collection MIT
description This paper builds on a technical report written by Carl Hewitt and Henry Baker called "Actors and Continuous Functionals". What is called a "goal-oriented activity" in that paper will be referred to in this paper as a "transaction". The word "transaction" brings to mind an object closer in function to what we wish to present than does the word "activity". This memo, therefore, presents the definitions of a reply and a transaction as given in Hewitt and Baker's paper and points out some discrepancies in their definitions. That is, that the properties of transactions and replies as they were defined did not correspond with our intuitions, and thus the definitions should be changed. The issues of what should constitute a transaction are discussed, and a new definition is presented which eliminates the discrepancies caused by the original definitions. Some properties of the newly defined transactions are discussed, and it is shown that the results of Hewitt and Baker's paper still hold given the new definitions.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T07:57:34Z
id mit-1721.1/5695
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T07:57:34Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/56952019-04-09T15:45:09Z Towards a Better Definition of Transactions Kerns, Barbara S. transactions data bases actors interactive systems This paper builds on a technical report written by Carl Hewitt and Henry Baker called "Actors and Continuous Functionals". What is called a "goal-oriented activity" in that paper will be referred to in this paper as a "transaction". The word "transaction" brings to mind an object closer in function to what we wish to present than does the word "activity". This memo, therefore, presents the definitions of a reply and a transaction as given in Hewitt and Baker's paper and points out some discrepancies in their definitions. That is, that the properties of transactions and replies as they were defined did not correspond with our intuitions, and thus the definitions should be changed. The issues of what should constitute a transaction are discussed, and a new definition is presented which eliminates the discrepancies caused by the original definitions. Some properties of the newly defined transactions are discussed, and it is shown that the results of Hewitt and Baker's paper still hold given the new definitions. 2004-10-01T20:31:35Z 2004-10-01T20:31:35Z 1980-12-01 AIM-609 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5695 en_US AIM-609 13 p. 3043265 bytes 2158451 bytes application/postscript application/pdf application/postscript application/pdf
spellingShingle transactions
data bases
actors
interactive systems
Kerns, Barbara S.
Towards a Better Definition of Transactions
title Towards a Better Definition of Transactions
title_full Towards a Better Definition of Transactions
title_fullStr Towards a Better Definition of Transactions
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Better Definition of Transactions
title_short Towards a Better Definition of Transactions
title_sort towards a better definition of transactions
topic transactions
data bases
actors
interactive systems
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5695
work_keys_str_mv AT kernsbarbaras towardsabetterdefinitionoftransactions