Distributional Implications of Alternative U.S. Greenhouse Gas Control Measures

Abstract and PDF report are also available on the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://globalchange.mit.edu/)

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rausch, Sebastian, Metcalf, Gilbert E., Reilly, John M., Paltsev, Sergey
Format: Technical Report
Language:en_US
Published: MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change 2010
Online Access:http://globalchange.mit.edu/pubs/abstract.php?publication_id=2065
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/57512
_version_ 1811096245670772736
author Rausch, Sebastian
Metcalf, Gilbert E.
Reilly, John M.
Paltsev, Sergey
author_facet Rausch, Sebastian
Metcalf, Gilbert E.
Reilly, John M.
Paltsev, Sergey
author_sort Rausch, Sebastian
collection MIT
description Abstract and PDF report are also available on the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://globalchange.mit.edu/)
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:40:54Z
format Technical Report
id mit-1721.1/57512
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:40:54Z
publishDate 2010
publisher MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/575122019-04-10T10:25:02Z Distributional Implications of Alternative U.S. Greenhouse Gas Control Measures Rausch, Sebastian Metcalf, Gilbert E. Reilly, John M. Paltsev, Sergey Abstract and PDF report are also available on the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://globalchange.mit.edu/) We analyze the distributional and efficiency impacts of different allowance allocation schemes for a national cap and trade system using the USREP model, a new recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model of the U.S. economy. The USREP model tracks nine different income groups and twelve different geographic regions within the United States. Recently proposed legislation include the Waxman-Markey House bill, the similar Kerry-Boxer bill in the Senate that has been replaced by a Kerry-Lieberman draft bill, and the Cantwell-Collins Senate bill that takes a different approach to revenue allocation. We consider allocation schemes motivated by these recent proposals applied to a comprehensive national cap and trade system that limits cumulative greenhouse gas emissions over the control period to 203 billion metric tons. The policy target approximates national goals identified in pending legislation. We find that the allocation schemes in all proposals are progressive over the lower half of the income distribution and proportional in the upper half of the income distribution. Scenarios based on the Cantwell-Collins allocation proposal are less progressive in early years and have lower welfare costs due to smaller redistribution to low income households and consequently lower income-induced increases in energy demand and less savings and investment. Scenarios based on the three other allocation schemes tend to overcompensate some adversely affected income groups and regions in early years but this dissipates over time as the allowance allocation effect becomes weaker. Finally we find that carbon pricing by itself (ignoring the return of carbon revenues through allowance allocations) is proportional to modestly progressive. This striking result follows from the dominance of the sources over uses side impacts of the policy and stands in sharp contrast to previous work that has focused only on the uses side. The main reason is that lower income households derive a large fraction of income from government transfers and, reflecting the reality that these are generally indexed to inflation, we hold the transfers constant in real terms. As a result this source of income is unaffected by carbon pricing, while wage and capital income is affected. This study received support from the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, which is funded by a consortium of government, industry and foundation sponsors. 2010-08-26T14:55:37Z 2010-08-26T14:55:37Z 2010-06 Technical Report http://globalchange.mit.edu/pubs/abstract.php?publication_id=2065 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/57512 Report no. 185 en_US ;Report no. 185 application/pdf MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
spellingShingle Rausch, Sebastian
Metcalf, Gilbert E.
Reilly, John M.
Paltsev, Sergey
Distributional Implications of Alternative U.S. Greenhouse Gas Control Measures
title Distributional Implications of Alternative U.S. Greenhouse Gas Control Measures
title_full Distributional Implications of Alternative U.S. Greenhouse Gas Control Measures
title_fullStr Distributional Implications of Alternative U.S. Greenhouse Gas Control Measures
title_full_unstemmed Distributional Implications of Alternative U.S. Greenhouse Gas Control Measures
title_short Distributional Implications of Alternative U.S. Greenhouse Gas Control Measures
title_sort distributional implications of alternative u s greenhouse gas control measures
url http://globalchange.mit.edu/pubs/abstract.php?publication_id=2065
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/57512
work_keys_str_mv AT rauschsebastian distributionalimplicationsofalternativeusgreenhousegascontrolmeasures
AT metcalfgilberte distributionalimplicationsofalternativeusgreenhousegascontrolmeasures
AT reillyjohnm distributionalimplicationsofalternativeusgreenhousegascontrolmeasures
AT paltsevsergey distributionalimplicationsofalternativeusgreenhousegascontrolmeasures