A THEORY OF FIRM SCOPE

The formal literature on firm boundaries has assumed that ex post conflicts are resolved through bargaining. In reality, parties often simply exercise their decision rights. We develop a model, based on shading, in which the use of authority has a central role. We consider two firms deciding whethe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hart, Oliver, Holmstrom, Bengt
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: MIT Press 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58806
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4846-1709
_version_ 1826197374970626048
author Hart, Oliver
Holmstrom, Bengt
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Hart, Oliver
Holmstrom, Bengt
author_sort Hart, Oliver
collection MIT
description The formal literature on firm boundaries has assumed that ex post conflicts are resolved through bargaining. In reality, parties often simply exercise their decision rights. We develop a model, based on shading, in which the use of authority has a central role. We consider two firms deciding whether to adopt a common standard. Nonintegrated firms may fail to coordinate if one firm loses. An integrated firm can internalize the externality, but puts insufficient weight on employee benefits. We use our approach to understand why Cisco acquired StrataCom, a provider of new transmission technology. We also analyze delegation.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:46:43Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/58806
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:46:43Z
publishDate 2010
publisher MIT Press
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/588062022-09-30T22:57:42Z A THEORY OF FIRM SCOPE Hart, Oliver Holmstrom, Bengt Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Holmstrom, Bengt Holmstrom, Bengt The formal literature on firm boundaries has assumed that ex post conflicts are resolved through bargaining. In reality, parties often simply exercise their decision rights. We develop a model, based on shading, in which the use of authority has a central role. We consider two firms deciding whether to adopt a common standard. Nonintegrated firms may fail to coordinate if one firm loses. An integrated firm can internalize the externality, but puts insufficient weight on employee benefits. We use our approach to understand why Cisco acquired StrataCom, a provider of new transmission technology. We also analyze delegation. National Science Foundation (U.S.) 2010-09-30T20:22:40Z 2010-09-30T20:22:40Z 2010-05 2010-04 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0033-5533 1531-4650 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58806 Hart, Oliver, and Bengt Holmstrom. “A Theory of Firm Scope.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125.2 (2010): 483-513. © 2010 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4846-1709 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.483 Quarterly Journal of Economics Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf MIT Press MIT Press
spellingShingle Hart, Oliver
Holmstrom, Bengt
A THEORY OF FIRM SCOPE
title A THEORY OF FIRM SCOPE
title_full A THEORY OF FIRM SCOPE
title_fullStr A THEORY OF FIRM SCOPE
title_full_unstemmed A THEORY OF FIRM SCOPE
title_short A THEORY OF FIRM SCOPE
title_sort theory of firm scope
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58806
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4846-1709
work_keys_str_mv AT hartoliver atheoryoffirmscope
AT holmstrombengt atheoryoffirmscope
AT hartoliver theoryoffirmscope
AT holmstrombengt theoryoffirmscope