Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants

Thesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2010.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bashadi, Sarah (Sarah Omer)
Other Authors: Howard Herzog.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59667
_version_ 1826192547686383616
author Bashadi, Sarah (Sarah Omer)
author2 Howard Herzog.
author_facet Howard Herzog.
Bashadi, Sarah (Sarah Omer)
author_sort Bashadi, Sarah (Sarah Omer)
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2010.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:20:34Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/59667
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:20:34Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/596672019-04-12T12:33:23Z Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants Using auxiliary gas power for carbon capture and storage energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants Bashadi, Sarah (Sarah Omer) Howard Herzog. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program. Engineering Systems Division. Technology and Policy Program. Thesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2010. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 93-96). Post-combustion capture retrofits are expected to a near-term option for mitigating CO 2 emissions from existing coal-fired power plants. Much of the literature proposes using power from the existing coal plant and thermal integration of its supercritical steam cycle with the stripper reboiler to supply the energy needed for solvent regeneration and CO2 compression. This study finds that using an auxiliary natural gas turbine plant to meet the energetic demands of carbon capture and compression may make retrofits more attractive compared to using thermal integration in some circumstances. Natural gas auxiliary plants increase the power output of the base plant and reduce technological risk associated with CCS, but require favorable natural gas prices and regional electricity demand for excess electricity to make using an auxiliary plant more desirable. Three different auxiliary plant technologies were compared to integration for 90% capture from an existing, 500 MW supercritical coal plant. CO2 capture and compression is simulated using Aspen Plus and a monoethylamine (MEA) absorption process. Thermoflow software is used to simulate three gas plant technologies. The three technologies assessed are the gas turbine (GT) with heat recovery steam generator (HRSG), gas turbine with HRSG and back pressure steam turbine, and natural gas boiler with back pressure steam turbine. The capital cost of the MEA unit is estimated using the Aspen Icarus Process Evaluator, and the capital cost of the external GT plants are estimated using the Thermoflow Plant Engineering and Cost Estimator. The gas turbine options are found to lead to electricity costs similar to integration, but their performance is highly sensitive to the price of natural gas and the economic impact of integration. Using a GT with a HRSG only has a lower capital cost but generates less excess electricity than the GT with HRSG and back pressure steam turbine. In order to generate enough steam for the reboiler, a significant amount of excess power was produced using both gas turbine configurations. This excess power could be attractive for coal plants located in regions with increasing electricity demand. An alternate capture plant scenario where a greater demand for power exists relative to steam is also considered. The economics of using auxiliary plant power improve slightly under this alternate energy profile scenario, but the most important factors affecting desirability of the auxiliary plant retrofit remain the cost of natural gas, the full cost of integration, and the potential for sale of excess electricity. by Sarah Bashadi. S.M.in Technology and Policy 2010-10-29T18:06:39Z 2010-10-29T18:06:39Z 2010 2010 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59667 668111555 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 97 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Engineering Systems Division.
Technology and Policy Program.
Bashadi, Sarah (Sarah Omer)
Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants
title Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants
title_full Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants
title_fullStr Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants
title_full_unstemmed Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants
title_short Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants
title_sort using auxiliary gas power for ccs energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants
topic Engineering Systems Division.
Technology and Policy Program.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59667
work_keys_str_mv AT bashadisarahsarahomer usingauxiliarygaspowerforccsenergyneedsinretrofittedcoalpowerplants
AT bashadisarahsarahomer usingauxiliarygaspowerforcarboncaptureandstorageenergyneedsinretrofittedcoalpowerplants