Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and non-CO₂ combustion effects from alternative jet fuels

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stratton, Russell William
Other Authors: James I. Hileman.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59694
_version_ 1811077354457399296
author Stratton, Russell William
author2 James I. Hileman.
author_facet James I. Hileman.
Stratton, Russell William
author_sort Stratton, Russell William
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:41:37Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/59694
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:41:37Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/596942019-04-10T09:19:40Z Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and non-CO₂ combustion effects from alternative jet fuels Stratton, Russell William James I. Hileman. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Aeronautics and Astronautics. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 135-144). The long-term viability and success of a transportation fuel depends on both economic and environmental sustainability. This thesis focuses specifically on assessing the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and non-CO 2 combustion effects from conventional jet fuel and synthetic paraffinic kerosene (SPK). The research expands upon the work of Wong (2008) by examining Fischer-Tropsch jet fuel from coal and biomass, and hydroprocessed renewable jet (HRJ) fuel from rapeseed, jatropha, algae and salicornia. Each fuel option is a "drop-in" alternative in that they are compatible with existing aviation infrastructure. Using a modified version of the APMT climate impacts module, the additional climate forcing from non-CO 2 combustion effects is combined with the fuel life cycle GHG inventories. Life cycle GHG emissions are only one of many aspects that must be considered when evaluating the feasibility and sustainability of an alternative fuel option. While cost and fresh water availability are important constraints, fuel yield and land requirements for select biomass-based fuel pathways are quantified. This is most important for feedstocks requiring cropland for cultivation. For example, current global production of soy, palm and rapeseed oil translate to only 34%, 43% and 18% of US jet fuel demand, respectively; hence, even small fractions of the petroleum industry translate to massive production scales in absolute terms. By comparison, HRJ from algal oil can yield more than an order of magnitude higher fuel production per hectare of land. Few biofuels were identified with zero life cycle GHG emissions. This contradicts previous studies and likely results from avoiding the displacement method to allocate emissions. Considerable inter and intra fuel option variability was found in life cycle GHG emissions; land use change contributed much to the variability of many pathways. The range in life cycle GHG emissions of all fuel options examined ranged from 0 to 9.1 times those of conventional jet fuel. The uncertainty in treating non-CO 2 combustion effects was found to have a larger influence on the life cycle emissions of each fuel option than the variability of the life cycle GHG inventories; however, including non-CO 2 combustion effects reduced the overall range in emissions of all fuel options considered to only 0 to 4.7 times those of conventional jet fuel. Hence, the inclusion of non-CO 2 effects in the fuel life cycle increases the absolute uncertainty of each fuel option but reduces the overall variability in the life cycle emissions of alternative fuels relative to conventional jet fuel. by Russell William Stratton. S.M. 2010-10-29T18:14:16Z 2010-10-29T18:14:16Z 2010 2010 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59694 668400725 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 144 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Stratton, Russell William
Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and non-CO₂ combustion effects from alternative jet fuels
title Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and non-CO₂ combustion effects from alternative jet fuels
title_full Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and non-CO₂ combustion effects from alternative jet fuels
title_fullStr Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and non-CO₂ combustion effects from alternative jet fuels
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and non-CO₂ combustion effects from alternative jet fuels
title_short Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and non-CO₂ combustion effects from alternative jet fuels
title_sort life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and non co₂ combustion effects from alternative jet fuels
topic Aeronautics and Astronautics.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59694
work_keys_str_mv AT strattonrussellwilliam lifecycleassessmentofgreenhousegasemissionsandnonco2combustioneffectsfromalternativejetfuels