Causal/Temporal Connectives: Syntax and Lexicon

This report elucidates the linguistic representation of temporal relations among events. This involves examining sentences that contain two clauses connected by words like once, by the time, when, and before. Specifically, the effect of the tenses of the connected clauses on the acceptability...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brent, Michael R.
Language:en_US
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6023
_version_ 1811089918212964352
author Brent, Michael R.
author_facet Brent, Michael R.
author_sort Brent, Michael R.
collection MIT
description This report elucidates the linguistic representation of temporal relations among events. This involves examining sentences that contain two clauses connected by words like once, by the time, when, and before. Specifically, the effect of the tenses of the connected clauses on the acceptability of sentences are examined. For example, Rachel disappeared once Jon had fallen asleep is fine, but *Rachel had disappeared once Jon fell asleep is unacceptable. A theory of acceptability is developed and its implications for interpretation discussed. Factoring of the linguisitic knowledge into a general, syntactic component and a lexical component clarifies the interpretation problem. Finally, a computer model of the theory is demonstrated.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:27:27Z
id mit-1721.1/6023
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:27:27Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/60232019-04-11T00:13:21Z Causal/Temporal Connectives: Syntax and Lexicon Brent, Michael R. natural language syntax tense temporal representation slexical semantics This report elucidates the linguistic representation of temporal relations among events. This involves examining sentences that contain two clauses connected by words like once, by the time, when, and before. Specifically, the effect of the tenses of the connected clauses on the acceptability of sentences are examined. For example, Rachel disappeared once Jon had fallen asleep is fine, but *Rachel had disappeared once Jon fell asleep is unacceptable. A theory of acceptability is developed and its implications for interpretation discussed. Factoring of the linguisitic knowledge into a general, syntactic component and a lexical component clarifies the interpretation problem. Finally, a computer model of the theory is demonstrated. 2004-10-04T14:36:11Z 2004-10-04T14:36:11Z 1989-09-01 AIM-1122 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6023 en_US AIM-1122 13 p. 1520491 bytes 608461 bytes application/postscript application/pdf application/postscript application/pdf
spellingShingle natural language
syntax
tense
temporal representation
slexical semantics
Brent, Michael R.
Causal/Temporal Connectives: Syntax and Lexicon
title Causal/Temporal Connectives: Syntax and Lexicon
title_full Causal/Temporal Connectives: Syntax and Lexicon
title_fullStr Causal/Temporal Connectives: Syntax and Lexicon
title_full_unstemmed Causal/Temporal Connectives: Syntax and Lexicon
title_short Causal/Temporal Connectives: Syntax and Lexicon
title_sort causal temporal connectives syntax and lexicon
topic natural language
syntax
tense
temporal representation
slexical semantics
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6023
work_keys_str_mv AT brentmichaelr causaltemporalconnectivessyntaxandlexicon