Properties and performance of the IEEE 802.11b complementary-code-key signal sets

We describe similarities and differences between complementary-code-key (CCK) modulation and modulation that is derived from biorthogonal signals, and we present performance results and other information that may be useful to those who have applications for CCK modulation that do not require IEEE 80...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Royster, Thomas C., IV, Pursley, Michael B.
Other Authors: Lincoln Laboratory
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60242
_version_ 1811074282724261888
author Royster, Thomas C., IV
Pursley, Michael B.
author2 Lincoln Laboratory
author_facet Lincoln Laboratory
Royster, Thomas C., IV
Pursley, Michael B.
author_sort Royster, Thomas C., IV
collection MIT
description We describe similarities and differences between complementary-code-key (CCK) modulation and modulation that is derived from biorthogonal signals, and we present performance results and other information that may be useful to those who have applications for CCK modulation that do not require IEEE 802.11 b compliance. The properties and performance of the highrate IEEE CCK 802.11 b modulation formats are investigated and compared with the properties and performance of alternative modulation formats that are based on biorthogonal signals. Several complementary properties are derived for the full-rate (11 Mb/s) CCK signal set, the half-rate (5.5 Mb/s) CCK signal set, a full-rate signal set obtained from biorthogonal signals, and a half-rate biorthogonal signal set. Each signal set is a complementary set, but each also has stronger complementary properties. We evaluate the performance of IEEE 802.11 b standard CCK modulation, CCK with certain modifications that depart from the IEEE standard, and modulation that is derived from biorthogonal signals. Performance comparisons are presented for additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels and for channels with specular multipath. In particular, for AWGN channels, we provide an accurate analytical approximation for the frame error probability for full-rate CCK modulation.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:46:36Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/60242
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:46:36Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/602422022-09-26T13:39:28Z Properties and performance of the IEEE 802.11b complementary-code-key signal sets Royster, Thomas C., IV Pursley, Michael B. Lincoln Laboratory Royster, Thomas C., IV Royster, Thomas C., IV We describe similarities and differences between complementary-code-key (CCK) modulation and modulation that is derived from biorthogonal signals, and we present performance results and other information that may be useful to those who have applications for CCK modulation that do not require IEEE 802.11 b compliance. The properties and performance of the highrate IEEE CCK 802.11 b modulation formats are investigated and compared with the properties and performance of alternative modulation formats that are based on biorthogonal signals. Several complementary properties are derived for the full-rate (11 Mb/s) CCK signal set, the half-rate (5.5 Mb/s) CCK signal set, a full-rate signal set obtained from biorthogonal signals, and a half-rate biorthogonal signal set. Each signal set is a complementary set, but each also has stronger complementary properties. We evaluate the performance of IEEE 802.11 b standard CCK modulation, CCK with certain modifications that depart from the IEEE standard, and modulation that is derived from biorthogonal signals. Performance comparisons are presented for additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels and for channels with specular multipath. In particular, for AWGN channels, we provide an accurate analytical approximation for the frame error probability for full-rate CCK modulation. United States. Office of Naval Research (N00014-04-1-0563) National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Graduate Research Fellowship) 2010-12-08T20:52:34Z 2010-12-08T20:52:34Z 2009-02 2009-02 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0090-6778 INSPEC Accession Number: 10475375 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60242 Pursley, M., and T. Royster Iv. “Properties and performance of the IEEE 802.11b complementary-code-key signal sets.” Communications, IEEE Transactions on 57.2 (2009): 440-449. ©2009 IEEE. en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2009.02.060642 IEEE Transactions on Communications Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IEEE
spellingShingle Royster, Thomas C., IV
Pursley, Michael B.
Properties and performance of the IEEE 802.11b complementary-code-key signal sets
title Properties and performance of the IEEE 802.11b complementary-code-key signal sets
title_full Properties and performance of the IEEE 802.11b complementary-code-key signal sets
title_fullStr Properties and performance of the IEEE 802.11b complementary-code-key signal sets
title_full_unstemmed Properties and performance of the IEEE 802.11b complementary-code-key signal sets
title_short Properties and performance of the IEEE 802.11b complementary-code-key signal sets
title_sort properties and performance of the ieee 802 11b complementary code key signal sets
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60242
work_keys_str_mv AT roysterthomasciv propertiesandperformanceoftheieee80211bcomplementarycodekeysignalsets
AT pursleymichaelb propertiesandperformanceoftheieee80211bcomplementarycodekeysignalsets