Global Precipitation Retrievals Using the NOAA AMSU Millimeter-Wave Channels: Comparisons with Rain Gauges
A surface-precipitation-rate retrieval algorithm for 13-channel Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) millimeter-wave spectral observations from 23 to 191 GHz is described. It was trained using cloud-resolving fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
American Meteorological Society
2010
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60322 |
_version_ | 1826212161050902528 |
---|---|
author | Surussavadee, Chinnawat Staelin, David H. |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Surussavadee, Chinnawat Staelin, David H. |
author_sort | Surussavadee, Chinnawat |
collection | MIT |
description | A surface-precipitation-rate retrieval algorithm for 13-channel Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) millimeter-wave spectral observations from 23 to 191 GHz is described. It was trained using cloud-resolving fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (MM5) simulations over 106 global storms. The resulting retrievals from the U.S. NOAA-15 and NOAA-16 operational weather satellites are compared with average annual accumulations (mm yr−1) for 2006–07 observed by 787 rain gauges globally distributed across 11 surface classifications defined using Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer infrared spectral images and two classifications defined geographically. Most surface classifications had bias ratios for AMSU/gauges that ranged from 0.88 to 1.59, although higher systematic AMSU overestimates by factors of 2.4, 3.1, and 9 were found for grassland, shrubs over bare ground, and pure bare ground, respectively. The retrievals were then empirically corrected using these observed biases for each surface type. Global images of corrected average annual accumulations of rain, snow, and convective and stratiform precipitation are presented for the period 2002–07. Most results are consistent with Global Precipitation Climatology Project estimates. Evidence based on MM5 simulations suggests that near-surface evaporation of precipitation may have necessitated most of the corrections for undervegetated surfaces. A new correction for radio-frequency interference affecting AMSU is also presented for the same two NOAA satellites and improves retrieval accuracies. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T15:17:00Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/60322 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | en_US |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T15:17:00Z |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | American Meteorological Society |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/603222022-09-29T13:53:45Z Global Precipitation Retrievals Using the NOAA AMSU Millimeter-Wave Channels: Comparisons with Rain Gauges Surussavadee, Chinnawat Staelin, David H. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics Staelin, David H. Surussavadee, Chinnawat Staelin, David H. A surface-precipitation-rate retrieval algorithm for 13-channel Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) millimeter-wave spectral observations from 23 to 191 GHz is described. It was trained using cloud-resolving fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (MM5) simulations over 106 global storms. The resulting retrievals from the U.S. NOAA-15 and NOAA-16 operational weather satellites are compared with average annual accumulations (mm yr−1) for 2006–07 observed by 787 rain gauges globally distributed across 11 surface classifications defined using Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer infrared spectral images and two classifications defined geographically. Most surface classifications had bias ratios for AMSU/gauges that ranged from 0.88 to 1.59, although higher systematic AMSU overestimates by factors of 2.4, 3.1, and 9 were found for grassland, shrubs over bare ground, and pure bare ground, respectively. The retrievals were then empirically corrected using these observed biases for each surface type. Global images of corrected average annual accumulations of rain, snow, and convective and stratiform precipitation are presented for the period 2002–07. Most results are consistent with Global Precipitation Climatology Project estimates. Evidence based on MM5 simulations suggests that near-surface evaporation of precipitation may have necessitated most of the corrections for undervegetated surfaces. A new correction for radio-frequency interference affecting AMSU is also presented for the same two NOAA satellites and improves retrieval accuracies. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (Grant NNX07AE35G) Thailand. Prince of Songkla University (Grant PSU 977/301) 2010-12-20T13:40:30Z 2010-12-20T13:40:30Z 2010-01 2009-04 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1558-8432 1558-8424 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60322 Surussavadee, Chinnawat, David H. Staelin, 2010: Global Precipitation Retrievals Using the NOAA AMSU Millimeter-Wave Channels: Comparisons with Rain Gauges. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 124–135. © 2010 American Meteorological Society en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009jamc2262.1 Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society |
spellingShingle | Surussavadee, Chinnawat Staelin, David H. Global Precipitation Retrievals Using the NOAA AMSU Millimeter-Wave Channels: Comparisons with Rain Gauges |
title | Global Precipitation Retrievals Using the NOAA AMSU Millimeter-Wave Channels: Comparisons with Rain Gauges |
title_full | Global Precipitation Retrievals Using the NOAA AMSU Millimeter-Wave Channels: Comparisons with Rain Gauges |
title_fullStr | Global Precipitation Retrievals Using the NOAA AMSU Millimeter-Wave Channels: Comparisons with Rain Gauges |
title_full_unstemmed | Global Precipitation Retrievals Using the NOAA AMSU Millimeter-Wave Channels: Comparisons with Rain Gauges |
title_short | Global Precipitation Retrievals Using the NOAA AMSU Millimeter-Wave Channels: Comparisons with Rain Gauges |
title_sort | global precipitation retrievals using the noaa amsu millimeter wave channels comparisons with rain gauges |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT surussavadeechinnawat globalprecipitationretrievalsusingthenoaaamsumillimeterwavechannelscomparisonswithraingauges AT staelindavidh globalprecipitationretrievalsusingthenoaaamsumillimeterwavechannelscomparisonswithraingauges |