Self-adjoint extensions to the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian

Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Physics, 2010.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brainerd, Andrew Eric
Other Authors: Roman W. Jackiw.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61203
_version_ 1826198185568108544
author Brainerd, Andrew Eric
author2 Roman W. Jackiw.
author_facet Roman W. Jackiw.
Brainerd, Andrew Eric
author_sort Brainerd, Andrew Eric
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Physics, 2010.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:00:29Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/61203
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:00:29Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/612032019-04-11T08:28:57Z Self-adjoint extensions to the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian Brainerd, Andrew Eric Roman W. Jackiw. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Physics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Physics. Physics. Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Physics, 2010. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 43). The Dirac equation is the relativistic generalization of the Schrödinger equation for spin 1/2 particles. It is written in the form -ihc -ihac OXIa+t' Omc 29 = ih-o (1.1) where V) is a four component Dirac spinor and the coefficients a and # are 4 x 4 matrices. Like the Schrödinger equation, the Dirac equation can be written as a time-independent eigenvalue equation H# = E* for a Hamiltonian operator H and energy eigenvalue E through separation of variables. The energy eigenvalues obtained by solving this equation must be real- one of the axioms of quantum mechanics is that physical observables, in this case energy, correspond to self-adjoint operators, in this case the Hamiltonian operator HI, acting on the Hilbert space 7H which describes the system in question. It can easily be shown that self-adjoint operators must have real eigenvalues. The reality of the energy eigenvalues becomes important when examining hydrogenic atoms using the Dirac equation. These atoms can be described by a Coulomb potential, V(r) = -Ze 2 /r, where Z is the number of protons in the nucleus and e is the elementary charge. When the nonrelativistic Schrodinger equation is solved for a Coulomb potential, the energy levels are given by the familiar Rydberg formula Z 2a 2mc2 1 En 2 2 (1.2) where Z is the number of protons in the atomic nucleus, a is the fine structure constant, m is the electron mass, c is the speed of light, and n a positive integer. Note that this formula assumes a stationary positive charge of infinite mass at the center of the atom, and that the energy levels for a more realistic model of an atom with a nucleus of finite mass M are given by replacing m with the reduced mass = mM/(m + M) in Eq. (1.2). When the Dirac equation in a Coulomb potential is used instead of the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation, the energy levels are instead given by - 1/2 En, = mc2 1+ a2 (1.3) n' - j j + )2_ - 2Z2 where n' is a positive integer and j is the total angular momentum of the electron. The total angular momentum j can take on values in the range 1/2, 3/2, ..., n' - 1/2. The eigenvalues in Eq. (1.3) match those in Eq. (1.2) in the limit VZ < 1, noting that in Eq. (1.2), a free electron is considered to have an energy of 0, while in Eq. (1.3), a free electron has energy mc2 . A problem arises with Eq. (1.3) when aZ > j--. The quantity (j + 2- aZ 2 is imaginary, causing Eq. (1.3) to yield complex energy eigenvalues. Since the eigenvalues of a self-adjoint operator must all be real, this indicates that the Hamiltonian cannot be self-adjoint when aZ > j + 1. This issue raises two questions. The first is whether there is a physical explanation for the failure of Eq. (1.2) for large Z. The second is whether this problem can be addressed mathematically by defining a new, self-adjoint operator H., which is constructed from the old Hamiltonian H as a self-adjoint extension. In this thesis, I will answer both of these questions in the affirmative, relying and building upon work done by others on these questions. I will show how the failure of Eq. (1.2) can be motivated by physical considerations, and I will examine a family of self-adjoint extensions to the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian constructed using von Neumann's method of deficiency indices. by Andrew Eric Brainerd. S.B. 2011-02-23T14:29:00Z 2011-02-23T14:29:00Z 2010 2010 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61203 701106459 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 43 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Physics.
Brainerd, Andrew Eric
Self-adjoint extensions to the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian
title Self-adjoint extensions to the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian
title_full Self-adjoint extensions to the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian
title_fullStr Self-adjoint extensions to the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian
title_full_unstemmed Self-adjoint extensions to the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian
title_short Self-adjoint extensions to the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian
title_sort self adjoint extensions to the dirac coulomb hamiltonian
topic Physics.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61203
work_keys_str_mv AT brainerdandreweric selfadjointextensionstothediraccoulombhamiltonian