Political Limits to Globalization
We live in an unprecedented age of globalization, where technology, ideas, factors of production, and goods are increasingly mobile across national boundaries. The current wave of globalization is distinguished from previous ones in part because of the major role of information technology. Nev...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
American Economic Association
2011
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61321 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-7491 |
_version_ | 1811073911450763264 |
---|---|
author | Acemoglu, Daron Yared, Pierre |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Acemoglu, Daron Yared, Pierre |
author_sort | Acemoglu, Daron |
collection | MIT |
description | We live in an unprecedented age of globalization,
where technology, ideas, factors of
production, and goods are increasingly mobile
across national boundaries. The current wave
of globalization is distinguished from previous
ones in part because of the major role of information
technology. Nevertheless, globalization
is not irreversible. Openness to international
trade, finance, and technology is a choice that
countries make, and despite the facilitating role
of information technology, many countries,
even many leading players in the world economy
including the United States, China, India,
Brazil, and Russia, could decide to close their
borders. A major cause of the end of the previous
(also historically unprecedented) nineteenth
century wave of globalization was disillusionment
with the international economic order, in
large part precipitated by the Great Depression
(e.g., Harold James 2001). Another, somewhat
less emphasized though not necessarily less
important cause was the rise of nationalism,
militarism, and international conflict (e.g.,
Ronald Findlay and Kevin H. O’Rourke 2007,
Reuven Glick and Alan M. Taylor 2005).1 The
previous wave of globalization took place in the
context of the 100 years following the end of the
1 Militarism is defined as the doctrine or policy of
“aggressive military preparedness,” which typically leads
to a country’s maintaining a strong military capability to
defend or promote its national interests.
growth in a partially de-globalized world†
Political Limits to Globalization
By Daron Acemoglu and Pierre Yared
Napoleonic wars, which were unusually peaceful
for European powers; it came to an end following
the most widespread conflict that human
society had experienced until then, World War I. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T09:40:06Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/61321 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | en_US |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T09:40:06Z |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | American Economic Association |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/613212022-09-30T16:02:48Z Political Limits to Globalization Acemoglu, Daron Yared, Pierre Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Acemoglu, Daron Acemoglu, Daron We live in an unprecedented age of globalization, where technology, ideas, factors of production, and goods are increasingly mobile across national boundaries. The current wave of globalization is distinguished from previous ones in part because of the major role of information technology. Nevertheless, globalization is not irreversible. Openness to international trade, finance, and technology is a choice that countries make, and despite the facilitating role of information technology, many countries, even many leading players in the world economy including the United States, China, India, Brazil, and Russia, could decide to close their borders. A major cause of the end of the previous (also historically unprecedented) nineteenth century wave of globalization was disillusionment with the international economic order, in large part precipitated by the Great Depression (e.g., Harold James 2001). Another, somewhat less emphasized though not necessarily less important cause was the rise of nationalism, militarism, and international conflict (e.g., Ronald Findlay and Kevin H. O’Rourke 2007, Reuven Glick and Alan M. Taylor 2005).1 The previous wave of globalization took place in the context of the 100 years following the end of the 1 Militarism is defined as the doctrine or policy of “aggressive military preparedness,” which typically leads to a country’s maintaining a strong military capability to defend or promote its national interests. growth in a partially de-globalized world† Political Limits to Globalization By Daron Acemoglu and Pierre Yared Napoleonic wars, which were unusually peaceful for European powers; it came to an end following the most widespread conflict that human society had experienced until then, World War I. 2011-02-24T15:18:25Z 2011-02-24T15:18:25Z 2010-05 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper 0002-8282 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61321 Acemoglu, Daron, and Pierre Yared. 2010. "Political Limits to Globalization." American Economic Review, 100(2): 83–88.© 2010 AEA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-7491 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.83 American Economic Review Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Economic Association MIT web domain |
spellingShingle | Acemoglu, Daron Yared, Pierre Political Limits to Globalization |
title | Political Limits to Globalization |
title_full | Political Limits to Globalization |
title_fullStr | Political Limits to Globalization |
title_full_unstemmed | Political Limits to Globalization |
title_short | Political Limits to Globalization |
title_sort | political limits to globalization |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61321 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-7491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acemogludaron politicallimitstoglobalization AT yaredpierre politicallimitstoglobalization |