Political Limits to Globalization

We live in an unprecedented age of globalization, where technology, ideas, factors of production, and goods are increasingly mobile across national boundaries. The current wave of globalization is distinguished from previous ones in part because of the major role of information technology. Nev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Acemoglu, Daron, Yared, Pierre
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: American Economic Association 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61321
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-7491
_version_ 1811073911450763264
author Acemoglu, Daron
Yared, Pierre
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Acemoglu, Daron
Yared, Pierre
author_sort Acemoglu, Daron
collection MIT
description We live in an unprecedented age of globalization, where technology, ideas, factors of production, and goods are increasingly mobile across national boundaries. The current wave of globalization is distinguished from previous ones in part because of the major role of information technology. Nevertheless, globalization is not irreversible. Openness to international trade, finance, and technology is a choice that countries make, and despite the facilitating role of information technology, many countries, even many leading players in the world economy including the United States, China, India, Brazil, and Russia, could decide to close their borders. A major cause of the end of the previous (also historically unprecedented) nineteenth century wave of globalization was disillusionment with the international economic order, in large part precipitated by the Great Depression (e.g., Harold James 2001). Another, somewhat less emphasized though not necessarily less important cause was the rise of nationalism, militarism, and international conflict (e.g., Ronald Findlay and Kevin H. O’Rourke 2007, Reuven Glick and Alan M. Taylor 2005).1 The previous wave of globalization took place in the context of the 100 years following the end of the 1 Militarism is defined as the doctrine or policy of “aggressive military preparedness,” which typically leads to a country’s maintaining a strong military capability to defend or promote its national interests. growth in a partially de-globalized world† Political Limits to Globalization By Daron Acemoglu and Pierre Yared Napoleonic wars, which were unusually peaceful for European powers; it came to an end following the most widespread conflict that human society had experienced until then, World War I.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:40:06Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/61321
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:40:06Z
publishDate 2011
publisher American Economic Association
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/613212022-09-30T16:02:48Z Political Limits to Globalization Acemoglu, Daron Yared, Pierre Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Acemoglu, Daron Acemoglu, Daron We live in an unprecedented age of globalization, where technology, ideas, factors of production, and goods are increasingly mobile across national boundaries. The current wave of globalization is distinguished from previous ones in part because of the major role of information technology. Nevertheless, globalization is not irreversible. Openness to international trade, finance, and technology is a choice that countries make, and despite the facilitating role of information technology, many countries, even many leading players in the world economy including the United States, China, India, Brazil, and Russia, could decide to close their borders. A major cause of the end of the previous (also historically unprecedented) nineteenth century wave of globalization was disillusionment with the international economic order, in large part precipitated by the Great Depression (e.g., Harold James 2001). Another, somewhat less emphasized though not necessarily less important cause was the rise of nationalism, militarism, and international conflict (e.g., Ronald Findlay and Kevin H. O’Rourke 2007, Reuven Glick and Alan M. Taylor 2005).1 The previous wave of globalization took place in the context of the 100 years following the end of the 1 Militarism is defined as the doctrine or policy of “aggressive military preparedness,” which typically leads to a country’s maintaining a strong military capability to defend or promote its national interests. growth in a partially de-globalized world† Political Limits to Globalization By Daron Acemoglu and Pierre Yared Napoleonic wars, which were unusually peaceful for European powers; it came to an end following the most widespread conflict that human society had experienced until then, World War I. 2011-02-24T15:18:25Z 2011-02-24T15:18:25Z 2010-05 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper 0002-8282 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61321 Acemoglu, Daron, and Pierre Yared. 2010. "Political Limits to Globalization." American Economic Review, 100(2): 83–88.© 2010 AEA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-7491 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.83 American Economic Review Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Economic Association MIT web domain
spellingShingle Acemoglu, Daron
Yared, Pierre
Political Limits to Globalization
title Political Limits to Globalization
title_full Political Limits to Globalization
title_fullStr Political Limits to Globalization
title_full_unstemmed Political Limits to Globalization
title_short Political Limits to Globalization
title_sort political limits to globalization
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61321
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-7491
work_keys_str_mv AT acemogludaron politicallimitstoglobalization
AT yaredpierre politicallimitstoglobalization