The Impact of Border Carbon Adjustments under Alternative Producer Responses

Abstract and PDF report are also available on the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://globalchange.mit.edu/)

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Winchester, Niven
Format: Technical Report
Language:en_US
Published: MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change 2011
Online Access:http://globalchange.mit.edu/pubs/abstract.php?publication_id=2137
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61770
_version_ 1811079109930909696
author Winchester, Niven
author_facet Winchester, Niven
author_sort Winchester, Niven
collection MIT
description Abstract and PDF report are also available on the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://globalchange.mit.edu/)
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:09:53Z
format Technical Report
id mit-1721.1/61770
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:09:53Z
publishDate 2011
publisher MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/617702019-04-10T15:45:10Z The Impact of Border Carbon Adjustments under Alternative Producer Responses Winchester, Niven Abstract and PDF report are also available on the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://globalchange.mit.edu/) Border carbon adjustments (BCAs) have been proposed to address leakage and competitiveness concerns. In traditional assessments, firms regard BCAs as output taxes rather than implicit emissions taxes. Using a stylized energy-economic model, we analyze the impact of BCAs for alternative producer responses. When firms view BCAs as an implicit emissions tax, the outcome depends on whether or not firms can differentiate production across destination markets. If firms are able to produce a low-emissions variety for regions imposing BCAs, results are similar to when firms regard BCAs as an output tax. If firms produce a single variety for all markets, BCAs result in larger leakage reductions than in standard approaches. We also find that BCAs are less effective at addressing competitive concerns in scenarios that result in larger leakage reductions. This study received support from the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, which is funded by a consortium of government, industry and foundation sponsors. 2011-03-23T18:41:08Z 2011-03-23T18:41:08Z 2011-02 Technical Report http://globalchange.mit.edu/pubs/abstract.php?publication_id=2137 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61770 Report no. 192 en_US ;Report no. 192 An error occurred on the license name. An error occurred getting the license - uri. application/pdf MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
spellingShingle Winchester, Niven
The Impact of Border Carbon Adjustments under Alternative Producer Responses
title The Impact of Border Carbon Adjustments under Alternative Producer Responses
title_full The Impact of Border Carbon Adjustments under Alternative Producer Responses
title_fullStr The Impact of Border Carbon Adjustments under Alternative Producer Responses
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Border Carbon Adjustments under Alternative Producer Responses
title_short The Impact of Border Carbon Adjustments under Alternative Producer Responses
title_sort impact of border carbon adjustments under alternative producer responses
url http://globalchange.mit.edu/pubs/abstract.php?publication_id=2137
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61770
work_keys_str_mv AT winchesterniven theimpactofbordercarbonadjustmentsunderalternativeproducerresponses
AT winchesterniven impactofbordercarbonadjustmentsunderalternativeproducerresponses