The Non-Identity Problem

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2010.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Urbanek, Valentina Maria
Other Authors: Caspar Hare.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/62420
_version_ 1826195355076657152
author Urbanek, Valentina Maria
author2 Caspar Hare.
author_facet Caspar Hare.
Urbanek, Valentina Maria
author_sort Urbanek, Valentina Maria
collection MIT
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2010.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:11:41Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/62420
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:11:41Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/624202019-04-11T03:51:04Z The Non-Identity Problem Urbanek, Valentina Maria Caspar Hare. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Linguistics and Philosophy. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2010. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 152-155). Some actions are identity affecting, they affect who will exist in the future. Explaining how identity affecting actions can be wrong has been thought to pose a problem, the Non-Identity Problem. The problem is that an identity affecting action could be wrong even though no one would be harmed if it were performed. If no one would be harmed, how can we explain why it is wrong? The Non-Identity Problem assumes that someone is harmed by an action only if someone would be worse-off if it were performed than they would be if it were not. I defend this assumption, and I argue that harm does not figure in any way into a plausible explanation of wrong-doing in examples of the Non-Identity Problem. Furthermore, I argue that the Non-Identity Problem is not an anomaly. There are other examples of actions that are wrong even though harm does not figure into any plausible explanation of why they are wrong. I focus on one: the wrong of increasing inequality between people who are equally deserving. I conclude that harm does not play a role in explaining all wrong actions, nor is harm an especially important consideration that counts against an action. Consistent with these lessons, I suggest that we think about the wrong done in examples that raise the Non-Identity Problem in the following way: we should ask what the action tells us about the agent's character. I argue that the action reveals to us a defect in the agent's character and an action that is the mark of a defective character is wrong. I identify the defect of character revealed by some of the most troubling examples of wrong-doing as insensitivity to suffering. Insensitivity to suffering can be exhibited to the same degree by an agent who harms someone as by an agent who harms no one. by Valentina Maria Urbanek. Ph.D. 2011-04-25T15:55:57Z 2011-04-25T15:55:57Z 2010 2010 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/62420 710986244 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 155 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Linguistics and Philosophy.
Urbanek, Valentina Maria
The Non-Identity Problem
title The Non-Identity Problem
title_full The Non-Identity Problem
title_fullStr The Non-Identity Problem
title_full_unstemmed The Non-Identity Problem
title_short The Non-Identity Problem
title_sort non identity problem
topic Linguistics and Philosophy.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/62420
work_keys_str_mv AT urbanekvalentinamaria thenonidentityproblem
AT urbanekvalentinamaria nonidentityproblem