Safe, secure and ethical? : assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology
Thesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2011.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65509 |
_version_ | 1826192927025528832 |
---|---|
author | Regårdh, Pernilla C. (Pernilla Christina) |
author2 | Kenneth A. Oye. |
author_facet | Kenneth A. Oye. Regårdh, Pernilla C. (Pernilla Christina) |
author_sort | Regårdh, Pernilla C. (Pernilla Christina) |
collection | MIT |
description | Thesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2011. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T09:31:18Z |
format | Thesis |
id | mit-1721.1/65509 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | eng |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T09:31:18Z |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/655092019-04-11T10:26:35Z Safe, secure and ethical? : assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology Assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology Regårdh, Pernilla C. (Pernilla Christina) Kenneth A. Oye. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program. Engineering Systems Division. Technology and Policy Program. Thesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2011. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 116-127). Synthetic biology is an emerging field, with a rapidly developing academic-industrial base and the promise of extensive product launches over the next few years. An intense debate over the risks and benefits of synthetic biology has developed even before commercialization. Nongovernmental organizations and official commissions have published over a dozen reports on the potential pitfalls and promise of synthetic biology, with widely varying analytic assumptions, assessment methods, definitions of values, and policy recommendations. How should governments go about developing regulatory policies to govern synthetic biology? This thesis begins by outlining the synthetic biology academic-industrial base, and then describes and critiques official and unofficial assessments of synthetic biology risks and the regulatory policies now in place to regulate risks. It differentiates among risks to security, safety and environment, and ethics, and finds that regulations in each of these areas suffer from significant deficits. Regulations are not well grounded on technical understanding of synthetic biology, lack methodologies for risk assessment of organisms without close natural counterparts, frame risk assessment as a technocratic process without substantial input from stakeholders, and emphasize physical risks to safety and security over non-physical threats to ethics and values. The thesis suggests that the US government and European Union modify existing regulations governing risks associated with synthetic biology and, more fundamentally, processes for developing such regulations to mitigate some of the deficits identified above. by Pernilla C. Regårdh. S.M.in Technology and Policy 2011-08-30T15:44:03Z 2011-08-30T15:44:03Z 2011 2011 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65509 746767663 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 127 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
spellingShingle | Engineering Systems Division. Technology and Policy Program. Regårdh, Pernilla C. (Pernilla Christina) Safe, secure and ethical? : assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology |
title | Safe, secure and ethical? : assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology |
title_full | Safe, secure and ethical? : assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology |
title_fullStr | Safe, secure and ethical? : assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology |
title_full_unstemmed | Safe, secure and ethical? : assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology |
title_short | Safe, secure and ethical? : assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology |
title_sort | safe secure and ethical assessing and regulating risks associated with synthetic biology |
topic | Engineering Systems Division. Technology and Policy Program. |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT regardhpernillacpernillachristina safesecureandethicalassessingandregulatingrisksassociatedwithsyntheticbiology AT regardhpernillacpernillachristina assessingandregulatingrisksassociatedwithsyntheticbiology |