CEO Compensation

This paper surveys the recent literature on CEO compensation. The rapid rise in CEO pay over the past 30 years has sparked an intense debate about the nature of the pay-setting process. Many view the high level of CEO compensation as the result of powerful managers setting their own pay. Others inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frydman, Carola, Jenter, Dirk
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Annual Review 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65955
_version_ 1826188878461009920
author Frydman, Carola
Jenter, Dirk
author2 Sloan School of Management
author_facet Sloan School of Management
Frydman, Carola
Jenter, Dirk
author_sort Frydman, Carola
collection MIT
description This paper surveys the recent literature on CEO compensation. The rapid rise in CEO pay over the past 30 years has sparked an intense debate about the nature of the pay-setting process. Many view the high level of CEO compensation as the result of powerful managers setting their own pay. Others interpret high pay as the result of optimal contracting in a competitive market for managerial talent. We describe and discuss the empirical evidence on the evolution of CEO pay and on the relationship between pay and firm performance since the 1930s. Our review suggests that both managerial power and competitive market forces are important determinants of CEO pay, but that neither approach is fully consistent with the available evidence. We briefly discuss promising directions for future research.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:06:23Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/65955
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:06:23Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Annual Review
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/659552022-09-23T10:55:57Z CEO Compensation Frydman, Carola Jenter, Dirk Sloan School of Management Frydman, Carola Frydman, Carola This paper surveys the recent literature on CEO compensation. The rapid rise in CEO pay over the past 30 years has sparked an intense debate about the nature of the pay-setting process. Many view the high level of CEO compensation as the result of powerful managers setting their own pay. Others interpret high pay as the result of optimal contracting in a competitive market for managerial talent. We describe and discuss the empirical evidence on the evolution of CEO pay and on the relationship between pay and firm performance since the 1930s. Our review suggests that both managerial power and competitive market forces are important determinants of CEO pay, but that neither approach is fully consistent with the available evidence. We briefly discuss promising directions for future research. 2011-09-23T20:06:13Z 2011-09-23T20:06:13Z 2010-12 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1941-1375 1941-1367 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65955 Frydman, Carola, and Dirk Jenter. “CEO Compensation.” Annual Review of Financial Economics 2 (2010): 75-102. en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-120209-133958 Annual Review of Financial Economics Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ application/pdf Annual Review MIT web domain
spellingShingle Frydman, Carola
Jenter, Dirk
CEO Compensation
title CEO Compensation
title_full CEO Compensation
title_fullStr CEO Compensation
title_full_unstemmed CEO Compensation
title_short CEO Compensation
title_sort ceo compensation
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65955
work_keys_str_mv AT frydmancarola ceocompensation
AT jenterdirk ceocompensation