The cost of noise reduction for powered-lift S.T.O.L. aircraft
February 1973
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Technical Report |
| Published: |
Cambridge, Mass. : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Flight Transportation Laboratory, [1973]
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67995 |
| _version_ | 1811080691234897920 |
|---|---|
| author | Moore, Wesley F. |
| author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory |
| author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory Moore, Wesley F. |
| author_sort | Moore, Wesley F. |
| collection | MIT |
| description | February 1973 |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:35:15Z |
| format | Technical Report |
| id | mit-1721.1/67995 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:35:15Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | Cambridge, Mass. : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Flight Transportation Laboratory, [1973] |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/679952019-04-10T10:00:07Z The cost of noise reduction for powered-lift S.T.O.L. aircraft Noise reduction for powered-lift STOL aircraft Moore, Wesley F. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory Short take-off and landing aircraft Noise February 1973 Also issued as an M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1973 Includes bibliographical references (p. 69-71) The direct operating costs and noise impacts of a wide variety of Externally Blown Flap and Augmentor Wing STOL short haul transport aircraft designs were evaluated to study the costs of noise reduction for these types of aircraft. The "two-stream" Augmentor Wing designs were found to be capable of the greatest noise reductions, and to have the lowest direct operating costs at all levels of noise impact. Sideline noise levels of 81 PNdB at 500 feet were attainable for an 80 seat aircraft with an 8 to 15 percent increase in direct operating cost over an aircraft designed with no constraints on noise. Supported by the Transportation Systems Center of the Department of Transportation 2012-01-06T06:59:22Z 2012-01-06T06:59:22Z 1973 Technical Report 09185694 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67995 FTL report (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory) ; R73-3 iv, 71 p application/pdf Cambridge, Mass. : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Flight Transportation Laboratory, [1973] |
| spellingShingle | Short take-off and landing aircraft Noise Moore, Wesley F. The cost of noise reduction for powered-lift S.T.O.L. aircraft |
| title | The cost of noise reduction for powered-lift S.T.O.L. aircraft |
| title_full | The cost of noise reduction for powered-lift S.T.O.L. aircraft |
| title_fullStr | The cost of noise reduction for powered-lift S.T.O.L. aircraft |
| title_full_unstemmed | The cost of noise reduction for powered-lift S.T.O.L. aircraft |
| title_short | The cost of noise reduction for powered-lift S.T.O.L. aircraft |
| title_sort | cost of noise reduction for powered lift s t o l aircraft |
| topic | Short take-off and landing aircraft Noise |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67995 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT moorewesleyf thecostofnoisereductionforpoweredliftstolaircraft AT moorewesleyf noisereductionforpoweredliftstolaircraft AT moorewesleyf costofnoisereductionforpoweredliftstolaircraft |