Competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems

February 1995

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chen, Edmund
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory
Format: Technical Report
Published: [Cambridge, Mass.] : Flight Transportation Laboratory, [1995] 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68139
_version_ 1826202938095173632
author Chen, Edmund
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory
Chen, Edmund
author_sort Chen, Edmund
collection MIT
description February 1995
first_indexed 2024-09-23T12:27:58Z
format Technical Report
id mit-1721.1/68139
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T12:27:58Z
publishDate 2012
publisher [Cambridge, Mass.] : Flight Transportation Laboratory, [1995]
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/681392019-04-10T23:32:55Z Competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems Chen, Edmund Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory Aeronautics, Commercial Competition Airports Revenue management Management February 1995 Also issued as an M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1995 Includes bibliographical references (p. 201-204) The way passenger traffic is distributed at multiple airport systems continues to intrigue air transportation planners, urban planners, and policy-makers as researchers attempt to unravel how airlines, air travelers and airports relate to each other. While previous research efforts have typically concentrated on the air travelers' choice of airports, the current thesis addresses how the competitive behavior of airlines operating in a deregulated environment influences the air traveler's choice of airports and the resulting distribution of passenger traffic in the multiple airport system. The methodology of the research first involves identifying four scenarios under which airlines compete in multiple airport environments, after which an anecdotal analysis of a select number of city-pair markets for each scenario was performed to solicit supporting evidence of competitive behavior of airlines. To keep the preliminary investigation simple, the author has chosen to study the dual-airport systems at Chicago and Houston. Owing to limitations of the data from O&DPlus and ONBOARD, the author used a strict set of criteria to identify 14 city-pair markets to analyze the response of passengers and airlines to challengers entering the city-pair markets between 1984 and 1993. The six quantitative indicators used in the anecdotal analyses include: average fares, average number of nonstop departures per day each way, quarterly origindestination traffic, quarterly non-origin-destination traffic, average quarterly load factors, and the quarterly total airport-to-airport origin-destination traffic. The results of the research indicate that while competition is evident, a general trend of competitive behavior of the airlines in the multiple airport environment is not discernible. The entry of a challenger typically elicits a variety of responses. Significant stimulation of the origin-destination traffic was observed in cases where low-fare carriers entered the market. The fact that the number of non-origin-destination passengers usually exceeds the number of origin-destination passengers may indicate that justification for the service in the airport-pairs examined goes beyond simply satisfying the demand for travel in the origin-destination market. Although quantitative modeling techniques were not used in this study, the author believes that future researchers should contend with the complex, multi-dimensional nature of airline competition before attempting to accurately model the competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems. 2012-01-06T22:30:25Z 2012-01-06T22:30:25Z 1995 Technical Report 43064680 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68139 FTL report (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory) ; R95-3 204 p application/pdf [Cambridge, Mass.] : Flight Transportation Laboratory, [1995]
spellingShingle Aeronautics, Commercial
Competition
Airports
Revenue management
Management
Chen, Edmund
Competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems
title Competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems
title_full Competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems
title_fullStr Competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems
title_full_unstemmed Competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems
title_short Competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems
title_sort competitive behavior of airlines at multiple airport systems
topic Aeronautics, Commercial
Competition
Airports
Revenue management
Management
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68139
work_keys_str_mv AT chenedmund competitivebehaviorofairlinesatmultipleairportsystems