Agreement as a fallible operation
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68196 |
_version_ | 1826195527275905024 |
---|---|
author | Preminger, Omer |
author2 | Sabine Iatridou, David Pesetsky and Norvin Richards. |
author_facet | Sabine Iatridou, David Pesetsky and Norvin Richards. Preminger, Omer |
author_sort | Preminger, Omer |
collection | MIT |
description | Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:14:08Z |
format | Thesis |
id | mit-1721.1/68196 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | eng |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:14:08Z |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/681962019-04-10T21:23:18Z Agreement as a fallible operation Preminger, Omer Sabine Iatridou, David Pesetsky and Norvin Richards. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Linguistics and Philosophy. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011. This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections. Cataloged from student submitted PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 195-207). In this thesis, I argue that the obligatory nature of agreement in [phi]-features (henceforth, [phi]-agreement) cannot be captured by appealing to "derivational time-bombs"-elements of the initial representation that cannot be part of a well-formed, end-of-the-derivation structure, and which are eliminated by the application of [phi]-agreement itself (as in Chomsky's 2000, 2001 uninterpretable features approach, for example). Instead, it requires recourse to an operation- one whose invocation is obligatory, but whose successful culmination is not enforced by the grammar. I then discuss the implications of this conclusion for the analysis of defective intervention by dative nominals. These results lead to a novel view of the interaction of '-agreement with case, furnishing an argument that both '-agreement and so-called "morphological case" must be computed within the syntactic component of the grammar. Finally, I survey other domains where the same operations-based logic proves well-suited to model the empirical state of affairs; these include Object Shift, the Definiteness Effect, and long-distance wh-movement. The thesis examines data from the Kichean languages of the Mayan family (primarily from Kaqchikel), as well as from Basque, Icelandic, and French. by Omer Preminger. Ph.D. 2012-01-11T20:18:24Z 2012-01-11T20:18:24Z 2011 2011 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68196 770757548 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 207 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
spellingShingle | Linguistics and Philosophy. Preminger, Omer Agreement as a fallible operation |
title | Agreement as a fallible operation |
title_full | Agreement as a fallible operation |
title_fullStr | Agreement as a fallible operation |
title_full_unstemmed | Agreement as a fallible operation |
title_short | Agreement as a fallible operation |
title_sort | agreement as a fallible operation |
topic | Linguistics and Philosophy. |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT premingeromer agreementasafallibleoperation |