Agreement as a fallible operation

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Preminger, Omer
Other Authors: Sabine Iatridou, David Pesetsky and Norvin Richards.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68196
_version_ 1826195527275905024
author Preminger, Omer
author2 Sabine Iatridou, David Pesetsky and Norvin Richards.
author_facet Sabine Iatridou, David Pesetsky and Norvin Richards.
Preminger, Omer
author_sort Preminger, Omer
collection MIT
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:14:08Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/68196
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:14:08Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/681962019-04-10T21:23:18Z Agreement as a fallible operation Preminger, Omer Sabine Iatridou, David Pesetsky and Norvin Richards. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Linguistics and Philosophy. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011. This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections. Cataloged from student submitted PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 195-207). In this thesis, I argue that the obligatory nature of agreement in [phi]-features (henceforth, [phi]-agreement) cannot be captured by appealing to "derivational time-bombs"-elements of the initial representation that cannot be part of a well-formed, end-of-the-derivation structure, and which are eliminated by the application of [phi]-agreement itself (as in Chomsky's 2000, 2001 uninterpretable features approach, for example). Instead, it requires recourse to an operation- one whose invocation is obligatory, but whose successful culmination is not enforced by the grammar. I then discuss the implications of this conclusion for the analysis of defective intervention by dative nominals. These results lead to a novel view of the interaction of '-agreement with case, furnishing an argument that both '-agreement and so-called "morphological case" must be computed within the syntactic component of the grammar. Finally, I survey other domains where the same operations-based logic proves well-suited to model the empirical state of affairs; these include Object Shift, the Definiteness Effect, and long-distance wh-movement. The thesis examines data from the Kichean languages of the Mayan family (primarily from Kaqchikel), as well as from Basque, Icelandic, and French. by Omer Preminger. Ph.D. 2012-01-11T20:18:24Z 2012-01-11T20:18:24Z 2011 2011 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68196 770757548 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 207 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Linguistics and Philosophy.
Preminger, Omer
Agreement as a fallible operation
title Agreement as a fallible operation
title_full Agreement as a fallible operation
title_fullStr Agreement as a fallible operation
title_full_unstemmed Agreement as a fallible operation
title_short Agreement as a fallible operation
title_sort agreement as a fallible operation
topic Linguistics and Philosophy.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68196
work_keys_str_mv AT premingeromer agreementasafallibleoperation