Improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2011.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hsu, Sophia Lisbeth
Other Authors: John Ochsendorf.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68414
_version_ 1826189371571699712
author Hsu, Sophia Lisbeth
author2 John Ochsendorf.
author_facet John Ochsendorf.
Hsu, Sophia Lisbeth
author_sort Hsu, Sophia Lisbeth
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2011.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:13:42Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/68414
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:13:42Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/684142022-01-13T07:54:12Z Improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment Hsu, Sophia Lisbeth John Ochsendorf. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture Architecture. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2011. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 54-60). Life cycle assessment, or LCA, is a powerful method for measuring and reducing a building's environmental impacts. Its widespread adoption among designers would allow the environmental component of sustainability to gain more traction in design philosophy and client goals. Currently, the stakeholders in building design-both design professionals and clients-have few resources for proper LCA education and use, and there are no common metrics agreed upon for reporting the results of LCAs for buildings. This thesis assesses the strengths and weaknesses of resources available to design practitioners for performing LCA, including a pilot credit in the United States Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ratings system. A case study performs an LCA comparing two structural materials in an office building. The study aims to be as transparent and repeatable as possible, in order to set a good example on which to model future building LCAs. Based on the critical review of LCA resources and the lessons learned from the case study, eight key points are proposed for improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment projects. by Sophia Lisbeth Hsu. S.M. 2012-01-12T19:25:41Z 2012-01-12T19:25:41Z 2011 2011 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68414 768478161 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 71 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Architecture.
Hsu, Sophia Lisbeth
Improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment
title Improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment
title_full Improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment
title_fullStr Improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment
title_full_unstemmed Improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment
title_short Improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment
title_sort improving the quality and transparency of building life cycle assessment
topic Architecture.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68414
work_keys_str_mv AT hsusophialisbeth improvingthequalityandtransparencyofbuildinglifecycleassessment