Fluid Flow Modeling in Fractures

In this paper we study fluid flow in fractures using numerical simulation and address the challenging issue of hydraulic property characterization in fractures. The methodology is based on Computational Fluid Dynamics, using a finite-volume based discretization scheme. Steady-state, viscous, laminar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarkar, Sudipta, Toksoz, M. Nafi, Burns, Daniel R.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
Format: Technical Report
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68616
_version_ 1826200507863007232
author Sarkar, Sudipta
Toksoz, M. Nafi
Burns, Daniel R.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
Sarkar, Sudipta
Toksoz, M. Nafi
Burns, Daniel R.
author_sort Sarkar, Sudipta
collection MIT
description In this paper we study fluid flow in fractures using numerical simulation and address the challenging issue of hydraulic property characterization in fractures. The methodology is based on Computational Fluid Dynamics, using a finite-volume based discretization scheme. Steady-state, viscous, laminar flow simulations for a Newtonian fluid are carried out in both 2D and 3D fracture models. In 2D, flow is analyzed in single fractures, series and parallel combination of fractures, inclined fractures, intersecting fractures, mixed networks, and in real (rough-surface) fractures. In 3D, flow is simulated in both uniform and variable aperture fracture models. To characterize each fracture model with an equivalent hydraulic aperture, equations are derived for all possible scenarios followed by comparison and validation with results derived from flow simulation. Based on the fracture models analyzed, the following are some of the important findings: 1) For fractures connected in series, the equivalent hydraulic aperture is a weighted harmonic mean of cubed apertures of all fractures. 2) For fractures connected in parallel, the equivalent flow is simply the sum of all flows through individual fractures. 3) If a fracture is inclined with respect to the axis of pressure gradient, then the amount of flow will be reduced by a factor of cosine of the inclination angle. 4) Any network of randomly intersecting fractures can be replaced by a single fracture to give flow equivalence; the aperture of that equivalent fracture will roughly be close to the aperture of the fracture in the network that cuts across the boundaries (inlet and outlet) in the most continuous fashion and have the smallest inclination (with respect to the pressure gradient axis). 5) For hydraulic characterization purposes, fluid flow in fractures can be sufficiently modeled using both Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations for flow Reynolds number upto approximately 100.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:37:33Z
format Technical Report
id mit-1721.1/68616
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:37:33Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/686162019-04-12T15:20:25Z Fluid Flow Modeling in Fractures Sarkar, Sudipta Toksoz, M. Nafi Burns, Daniel R. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory Sarkar, Sudipta Toksoz, M. Nafi Burns, Daniel R. In this paper we study fluid flow in fractures using numerical simulation and address the challenging issue of hydraulic property characterization in fractures. The methodology is based on Computational Fluid Dynamics, using a finite-volume based discretization scheme. Steady-state, viscous, laminar flow simulations for a Newtonian fluid are carried out in both 2D and 3D fracture models. In 2D, flow is analyzed in single fractures, series and parallel combination of fractures, inclined fractures, intersecting fractures, mixed networks, and in real (rough-surface) fractures. In 3D, flow is simulated in both uniform and variable aperture fracture models. To characterize each fracture model with an equivalent hydraulic aperture, equations are derived for all possible scenarios followed by comparison and validation with results derived from flow simulation. Based on the fracture models analyzed, the following are some of the important findings: 1) For fractures connected in series, the equivalent hydraulic aperture is a weighted harmonic mean of cubed apertures of all fractures. 2) For fractures connected in parallel, the equivalent flow is simply the sum of all flows through individual fractures. 3) If a fracture is inclined with respect to the axis of pressure gradient, then the amount of flow will be reduced by a factor of cosine of the inclination angle. 4) Any network of randomly intersecting fractures can be replaced by a single fracture to give flow equivalence; the aperture of that equivalent fracture will roughly be close to the aperture of the fracture in the network that cuts across the boundaries (inlet and outlet) in the most continuous fashion and have the smallest inclination (with respect to the pressure gradient axis). 5) For hydraulic characterization purposes, fluid flow in fractures can be sufficiently modeled using both Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations for flow Reynolds number upto approximately 100. 2012-01-20T18:05:15Z 2012-01-20T18:05:15Z 2004 Technical Report http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68616 Earth Resources Laboratory Industry Consortia Annual Report;2004-05 application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
spellingShingle Sarkar, Sudipta
Toksoz, M. Nafi
Burns, Daniel R.
Fluid Flow Modeling in Fractures
title Fluid Flow Modeling in Fractures
title_full Fluid Flow Modeling in Fractures
title_fullStr Fluid Flow Modeling in Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Fluid Flow Modeling in Fractures
title_short Fluid Flow Modeling in Fractures
title_sort fluid flow modeling in fractures
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68616
work_keys_str_mv AT sarkarsudipta fluidflowmodelinginfractures
AT toksozmnafi fluidflowmodelinginfractures
AT burnsdanielr fluidflowmodelinginfractures