Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid
Power companies can benefit from the use of knowledge discovery methods and statistical machine learning for preventive maintenance. We introduce a general process for transforming historical electrical grid data into models that aim to predict the risk of failures for components and systems. These...
| मुख्य लेखकों: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| अन्य लेखक: | |
| स्वरूप: | लेख |
| भाषा: | en_US |
| प्रकाशित: |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
2012
|
| ऑनलाइन पहुंच: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68634 |
| _version_ | 1826203408740122624 |
|---|---|
| author | Rudin, Cynthia Waltz, David Anderson, Roger N. Boulanger, Albert Salleb-Aouissi, Ansaf Chow, Maggie Dutta, Haimonti Gross, Philip N. Huang, Bert Ierome, Steve Isaac, Delfina F. Kressner, Arthur Passonneau, Rebecca J. Radeva, Axinia Wu, Leon |
| author2 | Sloan School of Management |
| author_facet | Sloan School of Management Rudin, Cynthia Waltz, David Anderson, Roger N. Boulanger, Albert Salleb-Aouissi, Ansaf Chow, Maggie Dutta, Haimonti Gross, Philip N. Huang, Bert Ierome, Steve Isaac, Delfina F. Kressner, Arthur Passonneau, Rebecca J. Radeva, Axinia Wu, Leon |
| author_sort | Rudin, Cynthia |
| collection | MIT |
| description | Power companies can benefit from the use of knowledge discovery methods and statistical machine learning for preventive maintenance. We introduce a general process for transforming historical electrical grid data into models that aim to predict the risk of failures for components and systems. These models can be used directly by power companies to assist with prioritization of maintenance and repair work. Specialized versions of this process are used to produce (1) feeder failure rankings, (2) cable, joint, terminator, and transformer rankings, (3) feeder Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) estimates, and (4) manhole events vulnerability rankings. The process in its most general form can handle diverse, noisy, sources that are historical (static), semi-real-time, or real-time, incorporates state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for prioritization (supervised ranking or MTBF), and includes an evaluation of results via cross-validation and blind test. Above and beyond the ranked lists and MTBF estimates are business management interfaces that allow the prediction capability to be integrated directly into corporate planning and decision support; such interfaces rely on several important properties of our general modeling approach: that machine learning features are meaningful to domain experts, that the processing of data is transparent, and that prediction results are accurate enough to support sound decision making. We discuss the challenges in working with historical electrical grid data that were not designed for predictive purposes. The “rawness” of these data contrasts with the accuracy of the statistical models that can be obtained from the process; these models are sufficiently accurate to assist in maintaining New York City's electrical grid. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T12:36:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | mit-1721.1/68634 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| language | en_US |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T12:36:07Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/686342022-10-01T10:01:31Z Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid Rudin, Cynthia Waltz, David Anderson, Roger N. Boulanger, Albert Salleb-Aouissi, Ansaf Chow, Maggie Dutta, Haimonti Gross, Philip N. Huang, Bert Ierome, Steve Isaac, Delfina F. Kressner, Arthur Passonneau, Rebecca J. Radeva, Axinia Wu, Leon Sloan School of Management Rudin, Cynthia Rudin, Cynthia Waltz, David Power companies can benefit from the use of knowledge discovery methods and statistical machine learning for preventive maintenance. We introduce a general process for transforming historical electrical grid data into models that aim to predict the risk of failures for components and systems. These models can be used directly by power companies to assist with prioritization of maintenance and repair work. Specialized versions of this process are used to produce (1) feeder failure rankings, (2) cable, joint, terminator, and transformer rankings, (3) feeder Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) estimates, and (4) manhole events vulnerability rankings. The process in its most general form can handle diverse, noisy, sources that are historical (static), semi-real-time, or real-time, incorporates state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for prioritization (supervised ranking or MTBF), and includes an evaluation of results via cross-validation and blind test. Above and beyond the ranked lists and MTBF estimates are business management interfaces that allow the prediction capability to be integrated directly into corporate planning and decision support; such interfaces rely on several important properties of our general modeling approach: that machine learning features are meaningful to domain experts, that the processing of data is transparent, and that prediction results are accurate enough to support sound decision making. We discuss the challenges in working with historical electrical grid data that were not designed for predictive purposes. The “rawness” of these data contrasts with the accuracy of the statistical models that can be obtained from the process; these models are sufficiently accurate to assist in maintaining New York City's electrical grid. 2012-01-23T18:08:45Z 2012-01-23T18:08:45Z 2012-02 2011-05 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0162-8828 1939-3539 INSPEC Accession Number: 12425409 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68634 Rudin, Cynthia et al. “Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34.2 (2012): 328-345. en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2011.108 IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ application/pdf Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Prof. Rudin via Alex Caracuzzo |
| spellingShingle | Rudin, Cynthia Waltz, David Anderson, Roger N. Boulanger, Albert Salleb-Aouissi, Ansaf Chow, Maggie Dutta, Haimonti Gross, Philip N. Huang, Bert Ierome, Steve Isaac, Delfina F. Kressner, Arthur Passonneau, Rebecca J. Radeva, Axinia Wu, Leon Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid |
| title | Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid |
| title_full | Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid |
| title_fullStr | Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid |
| title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid |
| title_short | Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid |
| title_sort | machine learning for the new york city power grid |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68634 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rudincynthia machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT waltzdavid machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT andersonrogern machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT boulangeralbert machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT sallebaouissiansaf machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT chowmaggie machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT duttahaimonti machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT grossphilipn machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT huangbert machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT ieromesteve machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT isaacdelfinaf machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT kressnerarthur machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT passonneaurebeccaj machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT radevaaxinia machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid AT wuleon machinelearningforthenewyorkcitypowergrid |