BE-ing default : the morphosyntax of auxiliaries

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bjorkman, Bronwyn Alma Moore
Other Authors: Sabine Iatridou.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68911
_version_ 1811072274366726144
author Bjorkman, Bronwyn Alma Moore
author2 Sabine Iatridou.
author_facet Sabine Iatridou.
Bjorkman, Bronwyn Alma Moore
author_sort Bjorkman, Bronwyn Alma Moore
collection MIT
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:03:19Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/68911
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:03:19Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/689112019-04-10T20:28:29Z BE-ing default : the morphosyntax of auxiliaries Morphosyntax of auxiliaries Bjorkman, Bronwyn Alma Moore Sabine Iatridou. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Linguistics and Philosophy. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 241-256). This dissertation is concerned with the broad question of why auxiliary verbs occur in natural language. Much previous work has assumed that the occurrence of auxiliary verbs is morphologically or syntactically arbitrary. I argue instead that auxiliary verbs, particularly BE, arise as a result of general properties morphological and syntactic systems of verbal inflection. More specifically, I propose that the existence of auxiliary BE reflects the fact that the inflectional system can fail to unite inflectional material with a main verb. I argue the reasons for this failure are structural: inflectional information combines with the main verb via Agree (Chomsky, 1998), a process constrained by relativized locality. Certain inflectional contexts isolate inflectional features from the verb because other targets for inflectional Agree intervene between them, resulting in these features being stranded. Stranded features are morphologically realized separately from the main verb; if they are affixal, this triggers the insertion of a totally default verb (BE) within the morphological component. Framing this approach to inflection in terms of Agree, however, requires modification of Chomsky's original formulation, so that inflectional feature values can be passed downward (or fail to be passed downward) from functional heads onto the main verb. I argue for a "reverse" formulation of Agree similar to that adopted in a number of recent papers (Baker 2008, Zeijlstra 2010, Wurmbrand 2011, a.o.) The resulting framework for verbal inflection predicts that different patterns of auxiliary use arise cross-linguistically due to differences in which inflectional features are able to Agree locally with the main verb. I argue that this variation can be traced two factors independently known to differ cross-linguistically: inflectional feature markedness, determining which features are visible to Agree, and the distribution of head movement, able to move the verb into local relationships with higher functional heads. Subsequent chapters extend this general approach into a variety of related domains: the alternation between HAVE and BE in auxiliary selection, the conflict between this analysis of BE and the traditional analysis of DO-support as a process that rescues stranded inflection, and the interaction of verbal inflection and auxiliaries with counterfactual inflection marking. by Bronwyn Alma Moore Bjorkman. Ph.D. 2012-01-30T17:02:35Z 2012-01-30T17:02:35Z 2011 2011 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68911 773614323 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 256 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Linguistics and Philosophy.
Bjorkman, Bronwyn Alma Moore
BE-ing default : the morphosyntax of auxiliaries
title BE-ing default : the morphosyntax of auxiliaries
title_full BE-ing default : the morphosyntax of auxiliaries
title_fullStr BE-ing default : the morphosyntax of auxiliaries
title_full_unstemmed BE-ing default : the morphosyntax of auxiliaries
title_short BE-ing default : the morphosyntax of auxiliaries
title_sort be ing default the morphosyntax of auxiliaries
topic Linguistics and Philosophy.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68911
work_keys_str_mv AT bjorkmanbronwynalmamoore beingdefaultthemorphosyntaxofauxiliaries
AT bjorkmanbronwynalmamoore morphosyntaxofauxiliaries