Research in engineering design: the role of mathematical theory and empirical evidence
The editors of this journal have offered an opportunity to reply to Dr. Hazelrigg’s letter in depth. Indeed, with its numerous points of critique of the paper ‘‘The Pugh Controlled Convergence method’’ (Frey et al. 2009) stated so strongly, the letter demands a detailed rebuttal. We provide a r...
Main Authors: | Frey, Daniel, Herder, Paulien M., Wijnia, Ype, Subrahmanian, Eswaran, Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos, de Neufville, Richard, Oye, Kenneth A., Clausing, Don P. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/70575 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9811-8415 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9886-7512 |
Similar Items
-
The Pugh Controlled Convergence Method: Model-Based Evaluation and Implications for Design Theory
by: Wijnia, Ype, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Patents and Research Investments: Assessing the Empirical Evidence
by: Budish, Eric, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Theory and empirical evidence of the gender wage gap
by: Ali, Hassan, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Theory and empirical evidence of the gender wage gap
by: Ali, Hassan, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Exclusion of females in autism research: Empirical evidence for a “leaky” recruitment‐to‐research pipeline
by: D'Mello, Anila M, et al.
Published: (2023)