Comments on Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativity

Ralph Wedgwood has written a big book: not in terms of pages (though there are plenty) but in terms of scope and ambition. Scope, in that he addresses many of the central issues around normativity, providing an account of the semantics of ‘ought’, and then a metaphysics and an epistemology to go...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Holton, Richard
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Springer-Verlag 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/71769
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8116-2639
_version_ 1811090674556076032
author Holton, Richard
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Holton, Richard
author_sort Holton, Richard
collection MIT
description Ralph Wedgwood has written a big book: not in terms of pages (though there are plenty) but in terms of scope and ambition. Scope, in that he addresses many of the central issues around normativity, providing an account of the semantics of ‘ought’, and then a metaphysics and an epistemology to go with it; ambition in that so much of this is novel. Along the way there are myriad discussion of relevant philosophical background issues and of methodology.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:50:05Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/71769
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:50:05Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/717692022-10-01T22:46:10Z Comments on Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativity Holton, Richard Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Holton, Richard Holton, Richard Ralph Wedgwood has written a big book: not in terms of pages (though there are plenty) but in terms of scope and ambition. Scope, in that he addresses many of the central issues around normativity, providing an account of the semantics of ‘ought’, and then a metaphysics and an epistemology to go with it; ambition in that so much of this is novel. Along the way there are myriad discussion of relevant philosophical background issues and of methodology. 2012-07-23T20:59:03Z 2012-07-23T20:59:03Z 2010-04 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0031-8116 1573-0883 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/71769 Holton, Richard. “Comments on Ralph Wedgwood’s The Nature of Normativity.” Philosophical Studies 151.3 (2010): 449–457. Web. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8116-2639 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9550-z Philosophical Studies Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ application/pdf Springer-Verlag MIT web domain
spellingShingle Holton, Richard
Comments on Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativity
title Comments on Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativity
title_full Comments on Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativity
title_fullStr Comments on Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativity
title_full_unstemmed Comments on Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativity
title_short Comments on Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativity
title_sort comments on ralph wedgwood s the nature of normativity
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/71769
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8116-2639
work_keys_str_mv AT holtonrichard commentsonralphwedgwoodsthenatureofnormativity