An Empirical Comparison of SNoW and SVMs for Face Detection

Impressive claims have been made for the performance of the SNoW algorithm on face detection tasks by Yang et. al. [7]. In particular, by looking at both their results and those of Heisele et. al. [3], one could infer that the SNoW system performed substantially better than an SVM-based system, even...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alvira, Mariano, Rifkin, Ryan
Language:en_US
Published: 2004
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7219
_version_ 1811069907505250304
author Alvira, Mariano
Rifkin, Ryan
author_facet Alvira, Mariano
Rifkin, Ryan
author_sort Alvira, Mariano
collection MIT
description Impressive claims have been made for the performance of the SNoW algorithm on face detection tasks by Yang et. al. [7]. In particular, by looking at both their results and those of Heisele et. al. [3], one could infer that the SNoW system performed substantially better than an SVM-based system, even when the SVM used a polynomial kernel and the SNoW system used a particularly simplistic 'primitive' linear representation. We evaluated the two approaches in a controlled experiment, looking directly at performance on a simple, fixed-sized test set, isolating out 'infrastructure' issues related to detecting faces at various scales in large images. We found that SNoW performed about as well as linear SVMs, and substantially worse than polynomial SVMs.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:18:52Z
id mit-1721.1/7219
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:18:52Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/72192019-04-09T17:53:21Z An Empirical Comparison of SNoW and SVMs for Face Detection Alvira, Mariano Rifkin, Ryan Impressive claims have been made for the performance of the SNoW algorithm on face detection tasks by Yang et. al. [7]. In particular, by looking at both their results and those of Heisele et. al. [3], one could infer that the SNoW system performed substantially better than an SVM-based system, even when the SVM used a polynomial kernel and the SNoW system used a particularly simplistic 'primitive' linear representation. We evaluated the two approaches in a controlled experiment, looking directly at performance on a simple, fixed-sized test set, isolating out 'infrastructure' issues related to detecting faces at various scales in large images. We found that SNoW performed about as well as linear SVMs, and substantially worse than polynomial SVMs. 2004-10-20T20:50:07Z 2004-10-20T20:50:07Z 2001-01-01 AIM-2001-004 CBCL-193 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7219 en_US AIM-2001-004 CBCL-193 1232391 bytes 319169 bytes application/postscript application/pdf application/postscript application/pdf
spellingShingle Alvira, Mariano
Rifkin, Ryan
An Empirical Comparison of SNoW and SVMs for Face Detection
title An Empirical Comparison of SNoW and SVMs for Face Detection
title_full An Empirical Comparison of SNoW and SVMs for Face Detection
title_fullStr An Empirical Comparison of SNoW and SVMs for Face Detection
title_full_unstemmed An Empirical Comparison of SNoW and SVMs for Face Detection
title_short An Empirical Comparison of SNoW and SVMs for Face Detection
title_sort empirical comparison of snow and svms for face detection
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7219
work_keys_str_mv AT alviramariano anempiricalcomparisonofsnowandsvmsforfacedetection
AT rifkinryan anempiricalcomparisonofsnowandsvmsforfacedetection
AT alviramariano empiricalcomparisonofsnowandsvmsforfacedetection
AT rifkinryan empiricalcomparisonofsnowandsvmsforfacedetection