Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?

Philosophers have proposed many alleged examples of non-causal explanations of particular events. I discuss several well-known examples and argue that they fail to be non-causal. 1. Questions 2. Preliminaries 3. Explanations that Cite Causally Inert Entities 4. Explanations that Merely Cite La...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Skow, Bradford
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Oxford University Press 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73660
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540
_version_ 1811069303186784256
author Skow, Bradford
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Skow, Bradford
author_sort Skow, Bradford
collection MIT
description Philosophers have proposed many alleged examples of non-causal explanations of particular events. I discuss several well-known examples and argue that they fail to be non-causal. 1. Questions 2. Preliminaries 3. Explanations that Cite Causally Inert Entities 4. Explanations that Merely Cite Laws, I 5. Stellar Collapse 6. Explanations that Merely Cite Laws, II 7. A Final Example 8. Conclusion
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:08:57Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/73660
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:08:57Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/736602022-09-23T11:13:27Z Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)? Skow, Bradford Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Skow, Bradford Philosophers have proposed many alleged examples of non-causal explanations of particular events. I discuss several well-known examples and argue that they fail to be non-causal. 1. Questions 2. Preliminaries 3. Explanations that Cite Causally Inert Entities 4. Explanations that Merely Cite Laws, I 5. Stellar Collapse 6. Explanations that Merely Cite Laws, II 7. A Final Example 8. Conclusion 2012-10-05T18:36:18Z 2012-10-05T18:36:18Z 2014-09 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0007-0882 1464-3537 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73660 Skow, Bradford. "Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?" British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2014) 65 (3): 445-467. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axs047 British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ application/pdf Oxford University Press MIT web domain
spellingShingle Skow, Bradford
Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?
title Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?
title_full Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?
title_fullStr Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?
title_full_unstemmed Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?
title_short Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?
title_sort are there non causal explanations of particular events
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73660
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540
work_keys_str_mv AT skowbradford aretherenoncausalexplanationsofparticularevents