OPTIMIZATION OF THE HYBRID SULFUR CYCLE FOR HYDROGEN GENERATION
The hybrid sulfur cycle (modified from the Westinghouse Cycle) for decomposing water into oxygen and hydrogen is evaluated. Hydrogen is produced by electrolysis of sulfur dioxide and water mixture at low temperature, which also results in the formation of oxygen and sulfuric acid. The sulfuric ac...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Technical Report |
| Published: |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems. Nuclear Energy and Sustainability Program
2012
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75119 |
| _version_ | 1826196036584996864 |
|---|---|
| author | Jeong, Y. H. Kazimi, Mujid S. Hohnholt, K. J. Yildiz, Bilge |
| author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Nuclear Energy and Sustainability Program |
| author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Nuclear Energy and Sustainability Program Jeong, Y. H. Kazimi, Mujid S. Hohnholt, K. J. Yildiz, Bilge |
| author_sort | Jeong, Y. H. |
| collection | MIT |
| description | The hybrid sulfur cycle (modified from the Westinghouse Cycle) for decomposing water into
oxygen and hydrogen is evaluated. Hydrogen is produced by electrolysis of sulfur dioxide and
water mixture at low temperature, which also results in the formation of oxygen and sulfuric acid.
The sulfuric acid is decomposed into steam and sulfur trioxide, which at high temperature
(1100 K) is further decomposed into sulfur dioxide and oxygen.
The presence of sulfur dioxide along with water in the electrolyzer reduces the required
electrode potential well below that required for electrolysis of pure–water, thus reducing the total
energy consumed by the electrolyzer. Further, using only sulfuric acid for the thermochemical
processes minimizes the required chemical stock in the hydrogen plant well below that required
for the sulfur–iodine pure thermochemical cycle (SI cycle).
In this study, ways to optimize the energy efficiency of the hybrid cycle are explored by
varying the electrolyzer acid concentration, decomposer acid concentration, pressure and
temperature of the decomposer and internal heat recuperation, based on currently available
experimental data for the electrode potential.
An optimal cycle efficiency of 43.9% (LHV) appears to be achievable (5 bar, 1100 K and
60 mol–% of H[subscript 2]SO[subscript 4] at the decomposer, 70 w–% of H[subscript 2]SO[subscript 4] at the electrolyzer). However, the ideal
cycle efficiency is over 70% (LHV), which leaves room to improve the achievable efficiency with
further development. For a maximum temperature of 1200 K, 47% (LHV) appears to be the
maximum achievable cycle efficiency (10 bar, 1200 K and 60 mol–% of H[subscript 2]SO[subscript 4] for decomposer,
70 w–% of H[subscript 2]SO[subscript 4] for electrolyzer). The ideal cycle efficiency is over 80% (LHV). Operation
under elevated pressures (70 bar or higher) results in minimized equipment size and capital cost,
but there is loss in thermal efficiency. However, the loss in efficiency as pressure increases is not
large at high temperature (1200 K) compared to that at low temperatures (1000–1100 K).
Therefore, high pressure operation would be favored only if we can achieve high temperature.
The major factors that can affect the cycle efficiency are reducing the electrode over–potential
and having structural materials that can accommodate operation at high temperature and high acid
concentration. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:19:29Z |
| format | Technical Report |
| id | mit-1721.1/75119 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:19:29Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems. Nuclear Energy and Sustainability Program |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/751192019-04-12T20:30:49Z OPTIMIZATION OF THE HYBRID SULFUR CYCLE FOR HYDROGEN GENERATION Jeong, Y. H. Kazimi, Mujid S. Hohnholt, K. J. Yildiz, Bilge Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Nuclear Energy and Sustainability Program Jeong, Y. H. Kazimi, Mujid S. Hohnholt, K. J. Yildiz, Bilge The hybrid sulfur cycle (modified from the Westinghouse Cycle) for decomposing water into oxygen and hydrogen is evaluated. Hydrogen is produced by electrolysis of sulfur dioxide and water mixture at low temperature, which also results in the formation of oxygen and sulfuric acid. The sulfuric acid is decomposed into steam and sulfur trioxide, which at high temperature (1100 K) is further decomposed into sulfur dioxide and oxygen. The presence of sulfur dioxide along with water in the electrolyzer reduces the required electrode potential well below that required for electrolysis of pure–water, thus reducing the total energy consumed by the electrolyzer. Further, using only sulfuric acid for the thermochemical processes minimizes the required chemical stock in the hydrogen plant well below that required for the sulfur–iodine pure thermochemical cycle (SI cycle). In this study, ways to optimize the energy efficiency of the hybrid cycle are explored by varying the electrolyzer acid concentration, decomposer acid concentration, pressure and temperature of the decomposer and internal heat recuperation, based on currently available experimental data for the electrode potential. An optimal cycle efficiency of 43.9% (LHV) appears to be achievable (5 bar, 1100 K and 60 mol–% of H[subscript 2]SO[subscript 4] at the decomposer, 70 w–% of H[subscript 2]SO[subscript 4] at the electrolyzer). However, the ideal cycle efficiency is over 70% (LHV), which leaves room to improve the achievable efficiency with further development. For a maximum temperature of 1200 K, 47% (LHV) appears to be the maximum achievable cycle efficiency (10 bar, 1200 K and 60 mol–% of H[subscript 2]SO[subscript 4] for decomposer, 70 w–% of H[subscript 2]SO[subscript 4] for electrolyzer). The ideal cycle efficiency is over 80% (LHV). Operation under elevated pressures (70 bar or higher) results in minimized equipment size and capital cost, but there is loss in thermal efficiency. However, the loss in efficiency as pressure increases is not large at high temperature (1200 K) compared to that at low temperatures (1000–1100 K). Therefore, high pressure operation would be favored only if we can achieve high temperature. The major factors that can affect the cycle efficiency are reducing the electrode over–potential and having structural materials that can accommodate operation at high temperature and high acid concentration. Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (Post–doctoral Fellowship) 2012-11-30T16:44:00Z 2012-11-30T16:44:00Z 2005-05-01 Technical Report http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75119 MIT-NES;TR–004 application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems. Nuclear Energy and Sustainability Program |
| spellingShingle | Jeong, Y. H. Kazimi, Mujid S. Hohnholt, K. J. Yildiz, Bilge OPTIMIZATION OF THE HYBRID SULFUR CYCLE FOR HYDROGEN GENERATION |
| title | OPTIMIZATION OF THE HYBRID SULFUR CYCLE FOR HYDROGEN GENERATION |
| title_full | OPTIMIZATION OF THE HYBRID SULFUR CYCLE FOR HYDROGEN GENERATION |
| title_fullStr | OPTIMIZATION OF THE HYBRID SULFUR CYCLE FOR HYDROGEN GENERATION |
| title_full_unstemmed | OPTIMIZATION OF THE HYBRID SULFUR CYCLE FOR HYDROGEN GENERATION |
| title_short | OPTIMIZATION OF THE HYBRID SULFUR CYCLE FOR HYDROGEN GENERATION |
| title_sort | optimization of the hybrid sulfur cycle for hydrogen generation |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75119 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jeongyh optimizationofthehybridsulfurcycleforhydrogengeneration AT kazimimujids optimizationofthehybridsulfurcycleforhydrogengeneration AT hohnholtkj optimizationofthehybridsulfurcycleforhydrogengeneration AT yildizbilge optimizationofthehybridsulfurcycleforhydrogengeneration |