Reactor protection system design alternatives for sodium fast reactors

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2011.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DeWitte, Jacob D. (Jacob Dominic)
Other Authors: Neil E. Todreas and Michael J. Driscoll.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76523
_version_ 1826204787461324800
author DeWitte, Jacob D. (Jacob Dominic)
author2 Neil E. Todreas and Michael J. Driscoll.
author_facet Neil E. Todreas and Michael J. Driscoll.
DeWitte, Jacob D. (Jacob Dominic)
author_sort DeWitte, Jacob D. (Jacob Dominic)
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2011.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:01:24Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/76523
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:01:24Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/765232019-04-12T15:32:40Z Reactor protection system design alternatives for sodium fast reactors DeWitte, Jacob D. (Jacob Dominic) Neil E. Todreas and Michael J. Driscoll. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Nuclear Science and Engineering. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Nuclear Science and Engineering. Nuclear Science and Engineering. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2011. "January 2011." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 110-112). Historically, unprotected transients have been viewed as design basis events that can significantly challenge sodium-cooled fast reactors. The perceived potential consequences of a severe unprotected transient in a sodium-cooled fast reactor include an energetic core disruptive accident, vessel failure, and a large early release. These consequences can be avoided if unprotected transients are properly defended against, potentially improving the economics of sodium fast reactors. One way to defend against such accidents is to include a highly reliable reactor protection system. The perceived undesirability of the consequences arising from an unprotected transient has led some sodium fast reactor designers to consider incorporating several design modifications to the reactor protection system, including: self-actuated shutdown systems, articulated control rods, and seismic anticipatory scram systems. This study investigates the performance of these systems in sodium fast reactors. To analyze the impact of these proposed design alternatives, a model to analyze plant performance that incorporates uncertainty analysis is developed using RELAP5-3D and the ABR-1000 as the reference design. The performance of the proposed alternatives is analyzed during unprotected loss of flow and unprotected transient overpower scenarios, each exacerbated by a loss of heat sink. The recently developed Technology Neutral Framework is used to contextually rate performance of the proposed alternatives. Ultimately, this thesis offers a methodology for a designer to analyze reactor protection system design efficacy. The principle results of this thesis suggest that when using the Technology Neutral Framework as a licensing framework for a sodium-cooled fast reactor, the two independent scram systems of the ABR- 1000's reactor protection system perform well enough to screen unprotected transients from the design basis. While a regulator may still require consideration of accidents involving the failure of the reactor protection system, these events will not drive the design of the system. However, self-actuated shutdown systems may be called for to diversify the reactor protection system. Of these, the Curie point latch marginally reduces the conditional cladding damage probability for metal cores because of their rapid inherent feedback effects, but is more effective for the more sluggish oxide cores given reasonably long pump coastdown times. Flow levitated absorbers are highly effective at mitigating unprotected loss of flow events for both fuel types, but are limited in response during unprotected transient overpower events. When considered from a risk-informed perspective, a clear rationale and objective is needed to justify the inclusion of an additional feature such as self-actuated shutdown systems. The use of articulated safety rods as one of the diverse means of reactivity insertion and the implementation of an anticipatory seismic scram system may be the most cost-effective alternatives to provide defense in depth in light of the sodium fast reactor's susceptibility to seismic events. by Jacob D. DeWitte. S.M. 2013-01-23T19:48:34Z 2013-01-23T19:48:34Z 2011 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76523 823867743 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 179 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Nuclear Science and Engineering.
DeWitte, Jacob D. (Jacob Dominic)
Reactor protection system design alternatives for sodium fast reactors
title Reactor protection system design alternatives for sodium fast reactors
title_full Reactor protection system design alternatives for sodium fast reactors
title_fullStr Reactor protection system design alternatives for sodium fast reactors
title_full_unstemmed Reactor protection system design alternatives for sodium fast reactors
title_short Reactor protection system design alternatives for sodium fast reactors
title_sort reactor protection system design alternatives for sodium fast reactors
topic Nuclear Science and Engineering.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76523
work_keys_str_mv AT dewittejacobdjacobdominic reactorprotectionsystemdesignalternativesforsodiumfastreactors