Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses

Brain computer interface (BCI) technology has been proposed for motor neurorehabilitation, motor replacement and assistive technologies. It is an open question whether proprioceptive feedback affects the regulation of brain oscillations and therefore BCI control. We developed a BCI coupled on-line w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramos-Murguialday, Ander, Schurholz, Markus, Caggiano, Vittorio, Wildgruber, Moritz, Caria, Andrea, Hammer, Eva Maria, Halder, Sebastian, Birbaumer, Niels
Other Authors: McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Public Library of Science 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76610
_version_ 1811071031894343680
author Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
Schurholz, Markus
Caggiano, Vittorio
Wildgruber, Moritz
Caria, Andrea
Hammer, Eva Maria
Halder, Sebastian
Birbaumer, Niels
author2 McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT
author_facet McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT
Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
Schurholz, Markus
Caggiano, Vittorio
Wildgruber, Moritz
Caria, Andrea
Hammer, Eva Maria
Halder, Sebastian
Birbaumer, Niels
author_sort Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
collection MIT
description Brain computer interface (BCI) technology has been proposed for motor neurorehabilitation, motor replacement and assistive technologies. It is an open question whether proprioceptive feedback affects the regulation of brain oscillations and therefore BCI control. We developed a BCI coupled on-line with a robotic hand exoskeleton for flexing and extending the fingers. 24 healthy participants performed five different tasks of closing and opening the hand: (1) motor imagery of the hand movement without any overt movement and without feedback, (2) motor imagery with movement as online feedback (participants see and feel their hand, with the exoskeleton moving according to their brain signals, (3) passive (the orthosis passively opens and closes the hand without imagery) and (4) active (overt) movement of the hand and rest. Performance was defined as the difference in power of the sensorimotor rhythm during motor task and rest and calculated offline for different tasks. Participants were divided in three groups depending on the feedback receiving during task 2 (the other tasks were the same for all participants). Group 1 (n = 9) received contingent positive feedback (participants' sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) desynchronization was directly linked to hand orthosis movements), group 2 (n = 8) contingent “negative” feedback (participants' sensorimotor rhythm synchronization was directly linked to hand orthosis movements) and group 3 (n = 7) sham feedback (no link between brain oscillations and orthosis movements). We observed that proprioceptive feedback (feeling and seeing hand movements) improved BCI performance significantly. Furthermore, in the contingent positive group only a significant motor learning effect was observed enhancing SMR desynchronization during motor imagery without feedback in time. Furthermore, we observed a significantly stronger SMR desynchronization in the contingent positive group compared to the other groups during active and passive movements. To summarize, we demonstrated that the use of contingent positive proprioceptive feedback BCI enhanced SMR desynchronization during motor tasks.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:45:04Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/76610
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:45:04Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/766102022-09-30T10:59:24Z Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses Ramos-Murguialday, Ander Schurholz, Markus Caggiano, Vittorio Wildgruber, Moritz Caria, Andrea Hammer, Eva Maria Halder, Sebastian Birbaumer, Niels McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT Caggiano, Vittorio Brain computer interface (BCI) technology has been proposed for motor neurorehabilitation, motor replacement and assistive technologies. It is an open question whether proprioceptive feedback affects the regulation of brain oscillations and therefore BCI control. We developed a BCI coupled on-line with a robotic hand exoskeleton for flexing and extending the fingers. 24 healthy participants performed five different tasks of closing and opening the hand: (1) motor imagery of the hand movement without any overt movement and without feedback, (2) motor imagery with movement as online feedback (participants see and feel their hand, with the exoskeleton moving according to their brain signals, (3) passive (the orthosis passively opens and closes the hand without imagery) and (4) active (overt) movement of the hand and rest. Performance was defined as the difference in power of the sensorimotor rhythm during motor task and rest and calculated offline for different tasks. Participants were divided in three groups depending on the feedback receiving during task 2 (the other tasks were the same for all participants). Group 1 (n = 9) received contingent positive feedback (participants' sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) desynchronization was directly linked to hand orthosis movements), group 2 (n = 8) contingent “negative” feedback (participants' sensorimotor rhythm synchronization was directly linked to hand orthosis movements) and group 3 (n = 7) sham feedback (no link between brain oscillations and orthosis movements). We observed that proprioceptive feedback (feeling and seeing hand movements) improved BCI performance significantly. Furthermore, in the contingent positive group only a significant motor learning effect was observed enhancing SMR desynchronization during motor imagery without feedback in time. Furthermore, we observed a significantly stronger SMR desynchronization in the contingent positive group compared to the other groups during active and passive movements. To summarize, we demonstrated that the use of contingent positive proprioceptive feedback BCI enhanced SMR desynchronization during motor tasks. 2013-01-25T18:07:30Z 2013-01-25T18:07:30Z 2012-10 2012-06 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1932-6203 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76610 Ramos-Murguialday, Ander et al. “Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses.” Ed. Michael Hendricks. PLoS ONE 7.10 (2012): e47048. en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047048 PLoS ONE Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ application/pdf Public Library of Science PLoS
spellingShingle Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
Schurholz, Markus
Caggiano, Vittorio
Wildgruber, Moritz
Caria, Andrea
Hammer, Eva Maria
Halder, Sebastian
Birbaumer, Niels
Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses
title Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses
title_full Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses
title_fullStr Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses
title_full_unstemmed Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses
title_short Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses
title_sort proprioceptive feedback and brain computer interface bci based neuroprostheses
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76610
work_keys_str_mv AT ramosmurguialdayander proprioceptivefeedbackandbraincomputerinterfacebcibasedneuroprostheses
AT schurholzmarkus proprioceptivefeedbackandbraincomputerinterfacebcibasedneuroprostheses
AT caggianovittorio proprioceptivefeedbackandbraincomputerinterfacebcibasedneuroprostheses
AT wildgrubermoritz proprioceptivefeedbackandbraincomputerinterfacebcibasedneuroprostheses
AT cariaandrea proprioceptivefeedbackandbraincomputerinterfacebcibasedneuroprostheses
AT hammerevamaria proprioceptivefeedbackandbraincomputerinterfacebcibasedneuroprostheses
AT haldersebastian proprioceptivefeedbackandbraincomputerinterfacebcibasedneuroprostheses
AT birbaumerniels proprioceptivefeedbackandbraincomputerinterfacebcibasedneuroprostheses