Preferential targeting of co-evolving Gag residues in long-term non progressors

Background: A recent analysis of mutational patterns within Gag revealed independently evolving groups of residues (termed sectors) whose mutations are collectively coordinated. Of these sectors, sector 3 is the least tolerant of multiple simultaneous mutations and therefore is proposed to be the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunshine, J., Shekhar, Karthik, Heckerman, David, Frahm, Nicole, Chakraborty, Arup K
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Biomed Central Ltd. 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76619
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1268-9602
_version_ 1826212244018429952
author Sunshine, J.
Shekhar, Karthik
Heckerman, David
Frahm, Nicole
Chakraborty, Arup K
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
Sunshine, J.
Shekhar, Karthik
Heckerman, David
Frahm, Nicole
Chakraborty, Arup K
author_sort Sunshine, J.
collection MIT
description Background: A recent analysis of mutational patterns within Gag revealed independently evolving groups of residues (termed sectors) whose mutations are collectively coordinated. Of these sectors, sector 3 is the least tolerant of multiple simultaneous mutations and therefore is proposed to be the most vulnerable to a targeted immune attack. We hypothesized that coordinated CTL targeting of sector 3 residues is associated with immune control. Methods: We completed a comprehensive evaluation of Gag-specific responses in a cohort of 9 Long-term non-progressors (LTNPs, VL <2000 RNA copies/ml, untreated) and 9 HIV progressors (VL>10,000 RNA copies/ml, untreated). A Gag peptide set of 11-mer peptides overlapping by 10 amino acids was generated to reflect all variants found in at least 5% of clade B sequences in the LANL HIV Sequence Database. This peptide set includes 1300 peptides and covers all 500 amino acids of Gag. All study subjects were screened for responses to all peptides by IFN-γ/IL-2 FluoroSpot. Results: We observed a trend in the preferential targeting of sector 3 residues by LTNPs (p=0.07). This trend was not observed for any other sector or in total breadth of responses. Supporting the importance of sector 3 targeting, we found a significant positive correlation in our cohort between the relative proportion of sector 3 responses and CD4 count (r=0.49, p=0.04). We found no significant differences between LTNPs and HIV-Progressors in either the targeting of conserved 11-mers or overall Gag epitope variant recognition. Interestingly, LTNPs demonstrated higher levels of variant recognition than HIV-progressors when considering only the variable regions containing sector 3 residues. Conclusion: We found that preferential targeting of sector 3 residues distinguished Gag-specific responses between LTNPs and HIV-progressors, and that coordinated targeting of sector 3 residues may require cross-reactive responses. Additional investigations are ongoing to elucidate the role of sector 3 targeting in immune control of HIV.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:18:36Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/76619
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:18:36Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Biomed Central Ltd.
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/766192022-09-29T14:05:26Z Preferential targeting of co-evolving Gag residues in long-term non progressors Sunshine, J. Shekhar, Karthik Heckerman, David Frahm, Nicole Chakraborty, Arup K Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering Shekhar, Karthik Chakraborty, Arup K. Background: A recent analysis of mutational patterns within Gag revealed independently evolving groups of residues (termed sectors) whose mutations are collectively coordinated. Of these sectors, sector 3 is the least tolerant of multiple simultaneous mutations and therefore is proposed to be the most vulnerable to a targeted immune attack. We hypothesized that coordinated CTL targeting of sector 3 residues is associated with immune control. Methods: We completed a comprehensive evaluation of Gag-specific responses in a cohort of 9 Long-term non-progressors (LTNPs, VL <2000 RNA copies/ml, untreated) and 9 HIV progressors (VL>10,000 RNA copies/ml, untreated). A Gag peptide set of 11-mer peptides overlapping by 10 amino acids was generated to reflect all variants found in at least 5% of clade B sequences in the LANL HIV Sequence Database. This peptide set includes 1300 peptides and covers all 500 amino acids of Gag. All study subjects were screened for responses to all peptides by IFN-γ/IL-2 FluoroSpot. Results: We observed a trend in the preferential targeting of sector 3 residues by LTNPs (p=0.07). This trend was not observed for any other sector or in total breadth of responses. Supporting the importance of sector 3 targeting, we found a significant positive correlation in our cohort between the relative proportion of sector 3 responses and CD4 count (r=0.49, p=0.04). We found no significant differences between LTNPs and HIV-Progressors in either the targeting of conserved 11-mers or overall Gag epitope variant recognition. Interestingly, LTNPs demonstrated higher levels of variant recognition than HIV-progressors when considering only the variable regions containing sector 3 residues. Conclusion: We found that preferential targeting of sector 3 residues distinguished Gag-specific responses between LTNPs and HIV-progressors, and that coordinated targeting of sector 3 residues may require cross-reactive responses. Additional investigations are ongoing to elucidate the role of sector 3 targeting in immune control of HIV. 2013-01-28T19:40:08Z 2013-01-28T19:40:08Z 2012-09 2012-09 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1742-4690 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76619 Sunshine, J et al. “Preferential Targeting of Co-evolving Gag Residues in Long-term Non Progressors.” Retrovirology 9.Suppl 2 (2012): P278. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1268-9602 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-9-s2-p278 Retrovirology Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 application/pdf Biomed Central Ltd. BioMed Central
spellingShingle Sunshine, J.
Shekhar, Karthik
Heckerman, David
Frahm, Nicole
Chakraborty, Arup K
Preferential targeting of co-evolving Gag residues in long-term non progressors
title Preferential targeting of co-evolving Gag residues in long-term non progressors
title_full Preferential targeting of co-evolving Gag residues in long-term non progressors
title_fullStr Preferential targeting of co-evolving Gag residues in long-term non progressors
title_full_unstemmed Preferential targeting of co-evolving Gag residues in long-term non progressors
title_short Preferential targeting of co-evolving Gag residues in long-term non progressors
title_sort preferential targeting of co evolving gag residues in long term non progressors
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76619
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1268-9602
work_keys_str_mv AT sunshinej preferentialtargetingofcoevolvinggagresiduesinlongtermnonprogressors
AT shekharkarthik preferentialtargetingofcoevolvinggagresiduesinlongtermnonprogressors
AT heckermandavid preferentialtargetingofcoevolvinggagresiduesinlongtermnonprogressors
AT frahmnicole preferentialtargetingofcoevolvinggagresiduesinlongtermnonprogressors
AT chakrabortyarupk preferentialtargetingofcoevolvinggagresiduesinlongtermnonprogressors