Viewpoint: Rethinking the Neutrino

To some, this may be the year of the dragon, but in neutrino physics, this is the year of θ[subscript 13]. Only one year ago, this supposedly “tiny” mixing angle, which describes how neutrinos oscillate from one mass state to another, was undetected, but the last twelve months have seen a flurry of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Conrad, Janet
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: American Institute of Physics (AIP) 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77627
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0438
_version_ 1811075845573312512
author Conrad, Janet
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Conrad, Janet
author_sort Conrad, Janet
collection MIT
description To some, this may be the year of the dragon, but in neutrino physics, this is the year of θ[subscript 13]. Only one year ago, this supposedly “tiny” mixing angle, which describes how neutrinos oscillate from one mass state to another, was undetected, but the last twelve months have seen a flurry of results from experiments in Asia and Europe, culminating in the result from the Daya Bay Collaboration, now being reported in Physical Review Letters, that shows that θ[subscript 13] is not small after all [1]. A not-so-tiny mixing angle forces us to rethink theory, calling for new explanations for why quarks and leptons are so different. It also opens the door to new experiments, potentially allowing the discovery of CP violation—a difference between neutrinos and antineutrinos that may be related to the matter asymmetry of the early universe.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:12:39Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/77627
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:12:39Z
publishDate 2013
publisher American Institute of Physics (AIP)
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/776272022-09-26T16:27:33Z Viewpoint: Rethinking the Neutrino Conrad, Janet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics Conrad, Janet To some, this may be the year of the dragon, but in neutrino physics, this is the year of θ[subscript 13]. Only one year ago, this supposedly “tiny” mixing angle, which describes how neutrinos oscillate from one mass state to another, was undetected, but the last twelve months have seen a flurry of results from experiments in Asia and Europe, culminating in the result from the Daya Bay Collaboration, now being reported in Physical Review Letters, that shows that θ[subscript 13] is not small after all [1]. A not-so-tiny mixing angle forces us to rethink theory, calling for new explanations for why quarks and leptons are so different. It also opens the door to new experiments, potentially allowing the discovery of CP violation—a difference between neutrinos and antineutrinos that may be related to the matter asymmetry of the early universe. 2013-03-12T17:50:45Z 2013-03-12T17:50:45Z 2012-04 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0148-6349 1943-2879 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77627 Conrad, Janet. “Rethinking the Neutrino.” Physics 5, 47 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Physical Society https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0438 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/Physics.5.47 Physics Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Institute of Physics (AIP) APS
spellingShingle Conrad, Janet
Viewpoint: Rethinking the Neutrino
title Viewpoint: Rethinking the Neutrino
title_full Viewpoint: Rethinking the Neutrino
title_fullStr Viewpoint: Rethinking the Neutrino
title_full_unstemmed Viewpoint: Rethinking the Neutrino
title_short Viewpoint: Rethinking the Neutrino
title_sort viewpoint rethinking the neutrino
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77627
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0438
work_keys_str_mv AT conradjanet viewpointrethinkingtheneutrino