Volcano impacts on climate and biogeochemistry in a coupled carbon–climate model

Volcanic eruptions induce a dynamical response in the climate system characterized by short-term global reductions in both surface temperature and precipitation, as well as a response in biogeochemistry. The available observations of these responses to volcanic eruptions, such as to Pinatubo, provid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rothenberg, Daniel Alexander, Mahowald, N. M., Lindsay, K., Doney, Scott C., Moore, J. K., Thornton, P.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Copernicus GmbH 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77633
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8270-4831
_version_ 1811092796377923584
author Rothenberg, Daniel Alexander
Mahowald, N. M.
Lindsay, K.
Doney, Scott C.
Moore, J. K.
Thornton, P.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Rothenberg, Daniel Alexander
Mahowald, N. M.
Lindsay, K.
Doney, Scott C.
Moore, J. K.
Thornton, P.
author_sort Rothenberg, Daniel Alexander
collection MIT
description Volcanic eruptions induce a dynamical response in the climate system characterized by short-term global reductions in both surface temperature and precipitation, as well as a response in biogeochemistry. The available observations of these responses to volcanic eruptions, such as to Pinatubo, provide a valuable method to compare against model simulations. Here, the Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3) reproduces the physical climate response to volcanic eruptions in a realistic way, as compared to direct observations from the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo. The model's biogeochemical response to eruptions is smaller in magnitude than observed, but because of the lack of observations, it is not clear why or where the modeled carbon response is not strong enough. Comparison to other models suggests that this model response is much weaker over tropical land; however, the precipitation response in other models is not accurate, suggesting that other models could be getting the right response for the wrong reason. The underestimated carbon response in the model compared to observations could also be due to the ash and lava input of biogeochemically important species to the ocean, which are not included in the simulation. A statistically significant reduction in the simulated carbon dioxide growth rate is seen at the 90% level in the average of 12 large eruptions over the period 1870–2000, and the net uptake of carbon is primarily concentrated in the tropics, with large spatial variability. In addition, a method for computing the volcanic response in model output without using a control ensemble is tested against a traditional methodology using two separate ensembles of runs; the method is found to produce similar results in the global average. These results suggest that not only is simulating volcanoes a good test of coupled carbon–climate models, but also that this test can be performed without a control simulation in cases where it is not practical to run separate ensembles with and without volcanic eruptions.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:26:33Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/77633
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:26:33Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/776332022-10-02T02:41:05Z Volcano impacts on climate and biogeochemistry in a coupled carbon–climate model Rothenberg, Daniel Alexander Mahowald, N. M. Lindsay, K. Doney, Scott C. Moore, J. K. Thornton, P. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Rothenberg, Daniel Alexander Volcanic eruptions induce a dynamical response in the climate system characterized by short-term global reductions in both surface temperature and precipitation, as well as a response in biogeochemistry. The available observations of these responses to volcanic eruptions, such as to Pinatubo, provide a valuable method to compare against model simulations. Here, the Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3) reproduces the physical climate response to volcanic eruptions in a realistic way, as compared to direct observations from the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo. The model's biogeochemical response to eruptions is smaller in magnitude than observed, but because of the lack of observations, it is not clear why or where the modeled carbon response is not strong enough. Comparison to other models suggests that this model response is much weaker over tropical land; however, the precipitation response in other models is not accurate, suggesting that other models could be getting the right response for the wrong reason. The underestimated carbon response in the model compared to observations could also be due to the ash and lava input of biogeochemically important species to the ocean, which are not included in the simulation. A statistically significant reduction in the simulated carbon dioxide growth rate is seen at the 90% level in the average of 12 large eruptions over the period 1870–2000, and the net uptake of carbon is primarily concentrated in the tropics, with large spatial variability. In addition, a method for computing the volcanic response in model output without using a control ensemble is tested against a traditional methodology using two separate ensembles of runs; the method is found to produce similar results in the global average. These results suggest that not only is simulating volcanoes a good test of coupled carbon–climate models, but also that this test can be performed without a control simulation in cases where it is not practical to run separate ensembles with and without volcanic eruptions. NASA Astrobiology Institute (NNGO6G127G) National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant 1049033) National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant 1021614) 2013-03-12T18:48:29Z 2013-03-12T18:48:29Z 2012-10 2012-09 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 2190-4987 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77633 Rothenberg, D. et al. “Volcano Impacts on Climate and Biogeochemistry in a Coupled Carbon–climate Model.” Earth System Dynamics 3.2 (2012): 121–136. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8270-4831 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-121-2012 Earth System Dynamics Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ application/pdf Copernicus GmbH Copernicus
spellingShingle Rothenberg, Daniel Alexander
Mahowald, N. M.
Lindsay, K.
Doney, Scott C.
Moore, J. K.
Thornton, P.
Volcano impacts on climate and biogeochemistry in a coupled carbon–climate model
title Volcano impacts on climate and biogeochemistry in a coupled carbon–climate model
title_full Volcano impacts on climate and biogeochemistry in a coupled carbon–climate model
title_fullStr Volcano impacts on climate and biogeochemistry in a coupled carbon–climate model
title_full_unstemmed Volcano impacts on climate and biogeochemistry in a coupled carbon–climate model
title_short Volcano impacts on climate and biogeochemistry in a coupled carbon–climate model
title_sort volcano impacts on climate and biogeochemistry in a coupled carbon climate model
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77633
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8270-4831
work_keys_str_mv AT rothenbergdanielalexander volcanoimpactsonclimateandbiogeochemistryinacoupledcarbonclimatemodel
AT mahowaldnm volcanoimpactsonclimateandbiogeochemistryinacoupledcarbonclimatemodel
AT lindsayk volcanoimpactsonclimateandbiogeochemistryinacoupledcarbonclimatemodel
AT doneyscottc volcanoimpactsonclimateandbiogeochemistryinacoupledcarbonclimatemodel
AT moorejk volcanoimpactsonclimateandbiogeochemistryinacoupledcarbonclimatemodel
AT thorntonp volcanoimpactsonclimateandbiogeochemistryinacoupledcarbonclimatemodel