Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010

Background: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies. Methods: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kornfield, Rachel, Donohue, Julie M., Berndt, Ernst R., Alexander, G. Caleb
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Public Library of Science 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78572
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6388-0768
_version_ 1826205447686717440
author Kornfield, Rachel
Donohue, Julie M.
Berndt, Ernst R.
Alexander, G. Caleb
author2 Sloan School of Management
author_facet Sloan School of Management
Kornfield, Rachel
Donohue, Julie M.
Berndt, Ernst R.
Alexander, G. Caleb
author_sort Kornfield, Rachel
collection MIT
description Background: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies. Methods: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-sectional data from 2001 through 2010 to examine direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) (Kantar Media) and provider-targeted promotion (IMS Health and SDI), including: (1) inflation-adjusted total promotion spending ($ and percent of sales); (2) distribution by channel (consumer v. provider); and (3) provider specialty both for the industry as a whole and for top-selling biologic and small molecule therapies. Results: Total promotion peaked in 2004 at US$36.1 billion (13.4% of sales). By 2010 it had declined to $27.7B (9.0% of sales). Between 2006 and 2010, similar declines were seen for promotion to providers and DTCA (both by 25%). DTCA’s share of total promotion increased from 12% in 2002 to 18% in 2006, but then declined to 16% and remains highly concentrated. Number of products promoted to providers peaked in 2004 at over 3000, and then declined 20% by 2010. In contrast to top-selling small molecule therapies having an average of $370 million (8.8% of sales) spent on promotion, top biologics were promoted less, with only $33 million (1.4% of sales) spent per product. Little change occurred in the composition of promotion between primary care physicians and specialists from 2001–2010. Conclusions: These findings suggest that pharmaceutical companies have reduced promotion following changes in the pharmaceutical pipeline and patent expiry for several blockbuster drugs. Promotional strategies for biologic drugs differ substantially from small molecule therapies.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:12:57Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/78572
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:12:57Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/785722022-09-28T12:40:41Z Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010 Kornfield, Rachel Donohue, Julie M. Berndt, Ernst R. Alexander, G. Caleb Sloan School of Management Berndt, Ernst R. Background: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies. Methods: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-sectional data from 2001 through 2010 to examine direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) (Kantar Media) and provider-targeted promotion (IMS Health and SDI), including: (1) inflation-adjusted total promotion spending ($ and percent of sales); (2) distribution by channel (consumer v. provider); and (3) provider specialty both for the industry as a whole and for top-selling biologic and small molecule therapies. Results: Total promotion peaked in 2004 at US$36.1 billion (13.4% of sales). By 2010 it had declined to $27.7B (9.0% of sales). Between 2006 and 2010, similar declines were seen for promotion to providers and DTCA (both by 25%). DTCA’s share of total promotion increased from 12% in 2002 to 18% in 2006, but then declined to 16% and remains highly concentrated. Number of products promoted to providers peaked in 2004 at over 3000, and then declined 20% by 2010. In contrast to top-selling small molecule therapies having an average of $370 million (8.8% of sales) spent on promotion, top biologics were promoted less, with only $33 million (1.4% of sales) spent per product. Little change occurred in the composition of promotion between primary care physicians and specialists from 2001–2010. Conclusions: These findings suggest that pharmaceutical companies have reduced promotion following changes in the pharmaceutical pipeline and patent expiry for several blockbuster drugs. Promotional strategies for biologic drugs differ substantially from small molecule therapies. 2013-04-17T20:10:48Z 2013-04-17T20:10:48Z 2013-03 2012-10 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1932-6203 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78572 Kornfield, Rachel et al. “Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010.” Ed. Alberico Catapano. PLoS ONE 8.3 (2013): e55504. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6388-0768 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055504 PLoS ONE Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ application/pdf Public Library of Science PLoS
spellingShingle Kornfield, Rachel
Donohue, Julie M.
Berndt, Ernst R.
Alexander, G. Caleb
Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_full Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_fullStr Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_full_unstemmed Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_short Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010
title_sort promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and providers 2001 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78572
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6388-0768
work_keys_str_mv AT kornfieldrachel promotionofprescriptiondrugstoconsumersandproviders20012010
AT donohuejuliem promotionofprescriptiondrugstoconsumersandproviders20012010
AT berndternstr promotionofprescriptiondrugstoconsumersandproviders20012010
AT alexandergcaleb promotionofprescriptiondrugstoconsumersandproviders20012010