Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector
Two methods are employed to measure the neutrino flux of the antineutrino-mode beam observed by the MiniBooNE detector. The first method compares data to simulated event rates in a high-purity ν[subscript μ]-induced charged-current single π[superscript +] (CC1π[superscript +]) sample while the secon...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2013
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78674 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9429-9482 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0438 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3837-3921 |
_version_ | 1811068611167518720 |
---|---|
author | Bugel, Leonard G. Conrad, Janet Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios Katori, Teppei Nguyen, V. Patch, A. |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics Bugel, Leonard G. Conrad, Janet Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios Katori, Teppei Nguyen, V. Patch, A. |
author_sort | Bugel, Leonard G. |
collection | MIT |
description | Two methods are employed to measure the neutrino flux of the antineutrino-mode beam observed by the MiniBooNE detector. The first method compares data to simulated event rates in a high-purity ν[subscript μ]-induced charged-current single π[superscript +] (CC1π[superscript +]) sample while the second exploits the difference between the angular distributions of muons created in ν[subscript μ] and ν̅[subscript μ] charged-current quasielastic (CCQE) interactions. The results from both analyses indicate the prediction of the neutrino flux component of the predominately antineutrino beam is overestimated—the CC1π[superscript +] analysis indicates the predicted ν[subscript μ] flux should be scaled by 0.76±0.11, while the CCQE angular fit yields 0.65±0.23. The energy spectrum of the flux prediction is checked by repeating the analyses in bins of reconstructed neutrino energy, and the results show that the spectral shape is well-modeled. These analyses are a demonstration of techniques for measuring the neutrino contamination of antineutrino beams observed by future nonmagnetized detectors. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T07:58:31Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/78674 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | en_US |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T07:58:31Z |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | American Physical Society |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/786742022-09-23T09:59:41Z Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector Bugel, Leonard G. Conrad, Janet Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios Katori, Teppei Nguyen, V. Patch, A. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science Conrad, Janet Marie Bugel, Leonard G. Conrad, Janet Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios Katori, Teppei Nguyen, V. Patch, A. Two methods are employed to measure the neutrino flux of the antineutrino-mode beam observed by the MiniBooNE detector. The first method compares data to simulated event rates in a high-purity ν[subscript μ]-induced charged-current single π[superscript +] (CC1π[superscript +]) sample while the second exploits the difference between the angular distributions of muons created in ν[subscript μ] and ν̅[subscript μ] charged-current quasielastic (CCQE) interactions. The results from both analyses indicate the prediction of the neutrino flux component of the predominately antineutrino beam is overestimated—the CC1π[superscript +] analysis indicates the predicted ν[subscript μ] flux should be scaled by 0.76±0.11, while the CCQE angular fit yields 0.65±0.23. The energy spectrum of the flux prediction is checked by repeating the analyses in bins of reconstructed neutrino energy, and the results show that the spectral shape is well-modeled. These analyses are a demonstration of techniques for measuring the neutrino contamination of antineutrino beams observed by future nonmagnetized detectors. 2013-05-02T19:02:28Z 2013-05-02T19:02:28Z 2011-10 2011-03 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1550-7998 1089-4918 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78674 Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. et al. “Measurement of the Neutrino Component of an Antineutrino Beam Observed by a Nonmagnetized Detector.” Physical Review D 84.7 (2011). © 2011 American Physical Society https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9429-9482 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0438 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3837-3921 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.072005 Physical Review D Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Physical Society APS |
spellingShingle | Bugel, Leonard G. Conrad, Janet Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios Katori, Teppei Nguyen, V. Patch, A. Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector |
title | Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector |
title_full | Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector |
title_fullStr | Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector |
title_short | Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector |
title_sort | measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78674 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9429-9482 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0438 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3837-3921 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bugelleonardg measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector AT conradjanet measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector AT karagiorgigeorgiastelios measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector AT katoriteppei measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector AT nguyenv measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector AT patcha measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector |