Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector

Two methods are employed to measure the neutrino flux of the antineutrino-mode beam observed by the MiniBooNE detector. The first method compares data to simulated event rates in a high-purity ν[subscript μ]-induced charged-current single π[superscript +] (CC1π[superscript +]) sample while the secon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bugel, Leonard G., Conrad, Janet, Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios, Katori, Teppei, Nguyen, V., Patch, A.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: American Physical Society 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78674
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9429-9482
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0438
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3837-3921
_version_ 1811068611167518720
author Bugel, Leonard G.
Conrad, Janet
Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios
Katori, Teppei
Nguyen, V.
Patch, A.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Bugel, Leonard G.
Conrad, Janet
Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios
Katori, Teppei
Nguyen, V.
Patch, A.
author_sort Bugel, Leonard G.
collection MIT
description Two methods are employed to measure the neutrino flux of the antineutrino-mode beam observed by the MiniBooNE detector. The first method compares data to simulated event rates in a high-purity ν[subscript μ]-induced charged-current single π[superscript +] (CC1π[superscript +]) sample while the second exploits the difference between the angular distributions of muons created in ν[subscript μ] and ν̅[subscript μ] charged-current quasielastic (CCQE) interactions. The results from both analyses indicate the prediction of the neutrino flux component of the predominately antineutrino beam is overestimated—the CC1π[superscript +] analysis indicates the predicted ν[subscript μ] flux should be scaled by 0.76±0.11, while the CCQE angular fit yields 0.65±0.23. The energy spectrum of the flux prediction is checked by repeating the analyses in bins of reconstructed neutrino energy, and the results show that the spectral shape is well-modeled. These analyses are a demonstration of techniques for measuring the neutrino contamination of antineutrino beams observed by future nonmagnetized detectors.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T07:58:31Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/78674
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T07:58:31Z
publishDate 2013
publisher American Physical Society
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/786742022-09-23T09:59:41Z Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector Bugel, Leonard G. Conrad, Janet Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios Katori, Teppei Nguyen, V. Patch, A. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science Conrad, Janet Marie Bugel, Leonard G. Conrad, Janet Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios Katori, Teppei Nguyen, V. Patch, A. Two methods are employed to measure the neutrino flux of the antineutrino-mode beam observed by the MiniBooNE detector. The first method compares data to simulated event rates in a high-purity ν[subscript μ]-induced charged-current single π[superscript +] (CC1π[superscript +]) sample while the second exploits the difference between the angular distributions of muons created in ν[subscript μ] and ν̅[subscript μ] charged-current quasielastic (CCQE) interactions. The results from both analyses indicate the prediction of the neutrino flux component of the predominately antineutrino beam is overestimated—the CC1π[superscript +] analysis indicates the predicted ν[subscript μ] flux should be scaled by 0.76±0.11, while the CCQE angular fit yields 0.65±0.23. The energy spectrum of the flux prediction is checked by repeating the analyses in bins of reconstructed neutrino energy, and the results show that the spectral shape is well-modeled. These analyses are a demonstration of techniques for measuring the neutrino contamination of antineutrino beams observed by future nonmagnetized detectors. 2013-05-02T19:02:28Z 2013-05-02T19:02:28Z 2011-10 2011-03 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1550-7998 1089-4918 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78674 Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. et al. “Measurement of the Neutrino Component of an Antineutrino Beam Observed by a Nonmagnetized Detector.” Physical Review D 84.7 (2011). © 2011 American Physical Society https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9429-9482 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0438 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3837-3921 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.072005 Physical Review D Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Physical Society APS
spellingShingle Bugel, Leonard G.
Conrad, Janet
Karagiorgi, Georgia Stelios
Katori, Teppei
Nguyen, V.
Patch, A.
Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector
title Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector
title_full Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector
title_fullStr Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector
title_short Measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector
title_sort measurement of the neutrino component of an antineutrino beam observed by a nonmagnetized detector
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78674
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9429-9482
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0438
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3837-3921
work_keys_str_mv AT bugelleonardg measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector
AT conradjanet measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector
AT karagiorgigeorgiastelios measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector
AT katoriteppei measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector
AT nguyenv measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector
AT patcha measurementoftheneutrinocomponentofanantineutrinobeamobservedbyanonmagnetizeddetector