Criteria for Evaluating the Success of Large-Scale Engineering Programs
The success framework describes performance aspects of large-scale engineering programs. It consists of 26 metrics in 5 categories. They are: 1. Enterprise strategy alignment, 2. Performance and quality, 3. Learning and change, 4. Process quality and efficiency, and 5. Financial and business success...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Design Society
2013
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81196 |
_version_ | 1826208322881060864 |
---|---|
author | Oehmen, Josef Steuber, Marc |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lean Advancement Initiative |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lean Advancement Initiative Oehmen, Josef Steuber, Marc |
author_sort | Oehmen, Josef |
collection | MIT |
description | The success framework describes performance aspects of large-scale engineering programs. It consists of 26 metrics in 5 categories. They are: 1. Enterprise strategy alignment, 2. Performance and quality, 3. Learning and change, 4. Process quality and efficiency, and 5. Financial and business success. It adds to the current literature accounting for added complexity and uncertainty when progressing from the project to the engineering program level. The findings are based on an extensive literature review and validation through an industry focus group. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T14:03:58Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/81196 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | en_US |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T14:03:58Z |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Design Society |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/811962022-10-01T18:57:12Z Criteria for Evaluating the Success of Large-Scale Engineering Programs Oehmen, Josef Steuber, Marc Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lean Advancement Initiative MIT Sociotechnical Systems Research Center Oehmen, Josef Oehmen, Josef The success framework describes performance aspects of large-scale engineering programs. It consists of 26 metrics in 5 categories. They are: 1. Enterprise strategy alignment, 2. Performance and quality, 3. Learning and change, 4. Process quality and efficiency, and 5. Financial and business success. It adds to the current literature accounting for added complexity and uncertainty when progressing from the project to the engineering program level. The findings are based on an extensive literature review and validation through an industry focus group. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lean Advancement Initiative Center for Clean Water and Clean Energy at MIT and KFUPM 2013-09-26T16:22:28Z 2013-09-26T16:22:28Z 2012-05 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper 19789537738181 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81196 Oehmen, Josef, and Steuber, Marc. "Criteria for evaluating the success of large-scale engineering programs." Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference (DESIGN 2012), pp. 103-112, Dubrovnik, Croatia. May 2012. en_US http://www.designsociety.org/publication/31977/criteria_for_evaluating_the_success_of_large-scale_engineering_programs Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference (DESIGN 2012) Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Design Society Josef Oehmen |
spellingShingle | Oehmen, Josef Steuber, Marc Criteria for Evaluating the Success of Large-Scale Engineering Programs |
title | Criteria for Evaluating the Success of Large-Scale Engineering Programs |
title_full | Criteria for Evaluating the Success of Large-Scale Engineering Programs |
title_fullStr | Criteria for Evaluating the Success of Large-Scale Engineering Programs |
title_full_unstemmed | Criteria for Evaluating the Success of Large-Scale Engineering Programs |
title_short | Criteria for Evaluating the Success of Large-Scale Engineering Programs |
title_sort | criteria for evaluating the success of large scale engineering programs |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oehmenjosef criteriaforevaluatingthesuccessoflargescaleengineeringprograms AT steubermarc criteriaforevaluatingthesuccessoflargescaleengineeringprograms |