Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision
This study investigated the interaction between remembered landmark and path integration strategies for estimating current location when walking in an environment without vision. We asked whether observers navigating without vision only rely on path integration information to judge their location, o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81226 |
_version_ | 1826200405313323008 |
---|---|
author | Schrater, Paul R. Legge, Gordon E. Kalia, Amy Ashwin |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Schrater, Paul R. Legge, Gordon E. Kalia, Amy Ashwin |
author_sort | Schrater, Paul R. |
collection | MIT |
description | This study investigated the interaction between remembered landmark and path integration strategies for estimating current location when walking in an environment without vision. We asked whether observers navigating without vision only rely on path integration information to judge their location, or whether remembered landmarks also influence judgments. Participants estimated their location in a hallway after viewing a target (remembered landmark cue) and then walking blindfolded to the same or a conflicting location (path integration cue). We found that participants averaged remembered landmark and path integration information when they judged that both sources provided congruent information about location, which resulted in more precise estimates compared to estimates made with only path integration. In conclusion, humans integrate remembered landmarks and path integration in a gated fashion, dependent on the congruency of the information. Humans can flexibly combine information about remembered landmarks with path integration cues while navigating without visual information. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:35:53Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/81226 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | en_US |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:35:53Z |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/812262022-09-27T20:36:00Z Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision Schrater, Paul R. Legge, Gordon E. Kalia, Amy Ashwin Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Kalia, Amy Ashwin This study investigated the interaction between remembered landmark and path integration strategies for estimating current location when walking in an environment without vision. We asked whether observers navigating without vision only rely on path integration information to judge their location, or whether remembered landmarks also influence judgments. Participants estimated their location in a hallway after viewing a target (remembered landmark cue) and then walking blindfolded to the same or a conflicting location (path integration cue). We found that participants averaged remembered landmark and path integration information when they judged that both sources provided congruent information about location, which resulted in more precise estimates compared to estimates made with only path integration. In conclusion, humans integrate remembered landmarks and path integration in a gated fashion, dependent on the congruency of the information. Humans can flexibly combine information about remembered landmarks with path integration cues while navigating without visual information. National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant T32 HD007151) National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant T32 EY07133) National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant F32EY019622) National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant EY02857) National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant EY017835-01) National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant EY015616-03) United States. Department of Education (H133A011903) 2013-09-30T12:28:33Z 2013-09-30T12:28:33Z 2013-09 2013-01 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1932-6203 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81226 Kalia, Amy A., Paul R. Schrater, and Gordon E. Legge. “Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision.” Edited by Marc O. Ernst. PLoS ONE 8, no. 9 (September 5, 2013): e72170. en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072170 PLoS ONE Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ application/pdf Public Library of Science PLoS |
spellingShingle | Schrater, Paul R. Legge, Gordon E. Kalia, Amy Ashwin Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision |
title | Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision |
title_full | Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision |
title_fullStr | Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision |
title_short | Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision |
title_sort | combining path integration and remembered landmarks when navigating without vision |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schraterpaulr combiningpathintegrationandrememberedlandmarkswhennavigatingwithoutvision AT leggegordone combiningpathintegrationandrememberedlandmarkswhennavigatingwithoutvision AT kaliaamyashwin combiningpathintegrationandrememberedlandmarkswhennavigatingwithoutvision |