Function follows form : how connectivity patterns govern neural responses

Thesis (Ph. D. in Neuroscience)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 2013.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Osher, David Eugene
Other Authors: John D. E. Gabrieli.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81731
_version_ 1826192760798969856
author Osher, David Eugene
author2 John D. E. Gabrieli.
author_facet John D. E. Gabrieli.
Osher, David Eugene
author_sort Osher, David Eugene
collection MIT
description Thesis (Ph. D. in Neuroscience)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 2013.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:28:30Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/81731
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:28:30Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/817312019-04-10T17:36:44Z Function follows form : how connectivity patterns govern neural responses Osher, David Eugene John D. E. Gabrieli. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. Brain and Cognitive Sciences. Thesis (Ph. D. in Neuroscience)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 2013. This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections. Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references. Connectivity restricts and defines the information that a network can process. It is the substance of information processing that underlies the patterns of functional activity in the brain. By combining diffusion-weighted imaging or DWI, with fMRI, we are able to non-invasively measure connectivity and neural responses in the same individuals and directly relate these two measures to one another. In Chapter 2, I first establish the proof-of-principle that anatomical connectivity alone can predict neural responses in cortex, specifically of face-selectivity in the fusiform gyrus. I then extend this novel approach to the rest of the brain and test whether connectivity can accurately predict neural responses to various visual categories in Chapter 3. Finally, in Chapter 4, I compare and contrast the resulting models, which are essentially networks of connectivity that are functionally-relevant to each visual category, and demonstrate the type of knowledge that can be uncovered by directly integrating structure and function. by David Eugene Osher. Ph.D.in Neuroscience 2013-10-24T18:10:17Z 2013-10-24T18:10:17Z 2013 2013 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81731 858804034 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 129 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
Osher, David Eugene
Function follows form : how connectivity patterns govern neural responses
title Function follows form : how connectivity patterns govern neural responses
title_full Function follows form : how connectivity patterns govern neural responses
title_fullStr Function follows form : how connectivity patterns govern neural responses
title_full_unstemmed Function follows form : how connectivity patterns govern neural responses
title_short Function follows form : how connectivity patterns govern neural responses
title_sort function follows form how connectivity patterns govern neural responses
topic Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81731
work_keys_str_mv AT osherdavideugene functionfollowsformhowconnectivitypatternsgovernneuralresponses