Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility
Microeconomic flexibility is at the core of economic growth in modern market economies because it facilitates the process of creative-destruction. The main reason why this process is not infinitely fast, is the presence of adjustment costs, some of them technological, others institutional. Chief amo...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | en_US |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2013
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/82666 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-451X |
| _version_ | 1826218088057536512 |
|---|---|
| author | Caballero, Ricardo J. Cowan, Kevin N. Engel, Eduardo M. R. A. Micco, Alejandro |
| author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics |
| author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Caballero, Ricardo J. Cowan, Kevin N. Engel, Eduardo M. R. A. Micco, Alejandro |
| author_sort | Caballero, Ricardo J. |
| collection | MIT |
| description | Microeconomic flexibility is at the core of economic growth in modern market economies because it facilitates the process of creative-destruction. The main reason why this process is not infinitely fast, is the presence of adjustment costs, some of them technological, others institutional. Chief among the latter is labor market regulation. While few economists object to the hypothesis that labor market regulation hinders the process of creative-destruction, its empirical support is limited. In this paper we revisit this hypothesis, using a new sectoral panel for 60 countries and a methodology suitable for such a panel. We find that job security regulation clearly hampers the creative-destruction process, especially in countries where regulations are likely to be enforced. Moving from the 20th to the 80th percentile in job security, in countries with strong rule of law, cuts the annual speed of adjustment to shocks by a third while shaving off about 1% from annual productivity growth. The same movement has negligible effects in countries with weak rule of law. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T17:13:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | mit-1721.1/82666 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| language | en_US |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T17:13:58Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/826662022-09-30T00:36:37Z Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility Caballero, Ricardo J. Cowan, Kevin N. Engel, Eduardo M. R. A. Micco, Alejandro Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Caballero, Ricardo J. Microeconomic flexibility is at the core of economic growth in modern market economies because it facilitates the process of creative-destruction. The main reason why this process is not infinitely fast, is the presence of adjustment costs, some of them technological, others institutional. Chief among the latter is labor market regulation. While few economists object to the hypothesis that labor market regulation hinders the process of creative-destruction, its empirical support is limited. In this paper we revisit this hypothesis, using a new sectoral panel for 60 countries and a methodology suitable for such a panel. We find that job security regulation clearly hampers the creative-destruction process, especially in countries where regulations are likely to be enforced. Moving from the 20th to the 80th percentile in job security, in countries with strong rule of law, cuts the annual speed of adjustment to shocks by a third while shaving off about 1% from annual productivity growth. The same movement has negligible effects in countries with weak rule of law. National Science Foundation (U.S.) 2013-12-06T17:27:16Z 2013-12-06T17:27:16Z 2013-03 2012-03 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 03043878 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/82666 Caballero, Ricardo J., Kevin N. Cowan, Eduardo M.R.A. Engel, and Alejandro Micco. “Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility.” Journal of Development Economics 101 (March 2013): 92-104. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-451X en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.009 Journal of Development Economics Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ application/pdf Elsevier SSRN |
| spellingShingle | Caballero, Ricardo J. Cowan, Kevin N. Engel, Eduardo M. R. A. Micco, Alejandro Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility |
| title | Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility |
| title_full | Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility |
| title_fullStr | Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility |
| title_short | Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility |
| title_sort | effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/82666 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-451X |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT caballeroricardoj effectivelaborregulationandmicroeconomicflexibility AT cowankevinn effectivelaborregulationandmicroeconomicflexibility AT engeleduardomra effectivelaborregulationandmicroeconomicflexibility AT miccoalejandro effectivelaborregulationandmicroeconomicflexibility |