National security panics : overestimating threats to national security

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2002.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cramer, Jane Kellett, 1964-
Other Authors: Stephen Van Evera.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8312
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8312
_version_ 1826192425777889280
author Cramer, Jane Kellett, 1964-
author2 Stephen Van Evera.
author_facet Stephen Van Evera.
Cramer, Jane Kellett, 1964-
author_sort Cramer, Jane Kellett, 1964-
collection MIT
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2002.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:12:25Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/8312
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:12:25Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/83122022-01-13T07:54:42Z National security panics : overestimating threats to national security Cramer, Jane Kellett, 1964- Stephen Van Evera. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science Political Science. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2002. Includes bibliographical references (p. 415-427). Three times in this century the US public has panicked with fear because of exaggerations of external threats to the nation. These panics peaked in 1950,1960, and 1980. Why did the U.S. markedly exaggerate the Soviet threat at these times? These periods of widespread public fear were "defining moments" when the US created confrontational and militarized containment policies. These panics ratcheted up the arms race tremendously between the US and the Soviet Union, and arguably these panics led to unnecessary confrontations and crises. In this study I test leading explanations of these cases--eight hypotheses drawn from three different perspectives. The Rational Perspective argues insufficient information and uncertainty about present and future capabilities and intentions causes overestimations. The Psychological Perspective argues cognitive errors could cause these overestimations (attribution theory and schema theory/analogical reasoning, tested here). The Domestic Politics Perspective argues oversell, logrolling, electoral politics and/or militarism causes public overestimations. Domestic Politics best explains the national misperceptions examined. In each case, the sources of the specific misperceptions examined were clearly rooted in domestic politics (1950: oversell and militarism; 1960 and 1980: electoral politics and militarism.) Uncertainty about the threat was found to be a significant contributing factor in 1950 (but not the source/elites did not unintentionally overestimate when the misperceptions first formed). (cont.) Uncertainty was found to be a significant "permissive condition" for the misperceptions of 1960-but uncertainty was highest just after Sputnik in 1957, and sharply decreased by 1960, yet public fear increased and peaked in 1960. There was no significant uncertainty in the 1980 panic--uncertainty is not a necessary condition for panic. Psychological hypotheses were not detected playing a role in causing these panics. Leaders private deliberations were examined and did not exhibit the patterns of reasoning predicted by these theories (e.g. leaders were aware of provoking the threat). National misperceptions guide policy and shape many leaders' beliefs through "blowback" and psychological post hoc rationaliztion. These large, important misperceptions are rooted in domestic politics, while international relations scholars focus on psychological and rational reasons for misperceptions. The study of misperceptions in international relations needs to be re-oriented. by Jane Kellett Cramer. Ph.D. 2007-11-15T21:37:06Z 2007-11-15T21:37:06Z 2002 2002 Thesis http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8312 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8312 50483093 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8312 http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 427 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Political Science.
Cramer, Jane Kellett, 1964-
National security panics : overestimating threats to national security
title National security panics : overestimating threats to national security
title_full National security panics : overestimating threats to national security
title_fullStr National security panics : overestimating threats to national security
title_full_unstemmed National security panics : overestimating threats to national security
title_short National security panics : overestimating threats to national security
title_sort national security panics overestimating threats to national security
topic Political Science.
url http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8312
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8312
work_keys_str_mv AT cramerjanekellett1964 nationalsecuritypanicsoverestimatingthreatstonationalsecurity